Janzen John M
Department of Anthropology, University of Kansas, 622 Fraser Hall, 1415 Jayhawk Blvd., Lawrence, KS, 66045, USA.
J Public Health Policy. 2016 Sep;37 Suppl 1:122-32. doi: 10.1057/s41271-016-0008-1.
This study, with a focus on Central and Southern Africa, offers an overview of best practices and theoretical debates in the anthropology of violence, including the ethnography of situations where violence is pervasive and active efforts are made to deal with it. Although the multiple sites of recent violence in this region are unique in their scale, intensity, and cause, the literature review suggests a typical course of events of patterns of violence and trauma, construction of memory, efforts at mediation and healing, or persisting conflict and confronting the aftermath of violence at home or in exile. The essay suggests that political reconciliation, healing, ritualized memory, and restoration of justice often accompany, singly or in combination, a break in the cycle of violence. Ethnography and anthropological analysis offers tools for policy-makers, therapists, and leaders to deal with the consequences of violence.
这项以中部和南部非洲为重点的研究概述了暴力人类学中的最佳实践和理论辩论,包括暴力普遍存在且人们积极努力应对暴力的情况的人种志研究。尽管该地区近期暴力事件的多个地点在规模、强度和原因方面具有独特性,但文献综述揭示了暴力和创伤模式、记忆构建、调解与疗伤努力,或持续冲突以及在国内或流亡中面对暴力后果的典型事件过程。本文指出,政治和解、疗伤、仪式化记忆和司法恢复往往单独或共同伴随着暴力循环的中断。人种志和人类学分析为政策制定者、治疗师和领导人应对暴力后果提供了工具。