Hannibal Darcy L
Department of Population Health and Reproduction, University of California, Davis, California.
California National Primate Research Center, University of California, Davis, California.
Am J Primatol. 2017 Feb;79(2):1-9. doi: 10.1002/ajp.22594. Epub 2016 Sep 19.
In this article, I describe a previously unreported maxillary lateral incisor defect (MLID) of the enamel in great apes and evaluate potential general causes (genetic, systemic stress, or localized disturbance), as well as examine differences in prevalence among the represented taxa. This defect occurred only on the labial surface of the maxillary lateral incisor and extended from the cervical-mesial quarter of the crown to the mesial edge of the cementoenamel junction (CEJ). The study sample consisted of 136 great ape specimens, including 41 gorillas, 25 chimpanzees, and 70 orangutans from the Smithsonian's National Museum of Natural History great ape collection. I used logistic regression to assess the prevalence of this defect in the sample and a binomial probability test for bilaterality. This defect of the maxillary lateral incisor is the second most common defect I observed in the study sample (30.1% of individuals affected), and was more likely to occur in individuals with linear enamel hypoplasia (LEH) and pit defects than those without these defects. Among specimens with both maxillary lateral incisors present, the defect was mostly bilateral. Pan and Pongo were significantly more likely to exhibit the defect than Gorilla. Between Pongo species, Pongo pygmaeus was significantly more likely to exhibit the defect than Pongo abelii. Between subspecies of Gorilla, although Gorilla gorilla gorilla exhibited the defect and Gorilla gorilla beringei did not, the difference was not significant. No sex differences were evident in this sample. The prevalence of this defect indicates it is not hereditary. The bilateral trend indicates a systemic cause, although the high inter-tooth specificity suggests a local disturbance and a combination of both is possible.
在本文中,我描述了一种此前未报道过的大型猿类上颌侧切牙釉质缺损(MLID),并评估了其潜在的一般原因(遗传、全身应激或局部干扰),同时研究了不同类群中该缺损患病率的差异。这种缺损仅发生在上颌侧切牙的唇面,从牙冠的颈中四分之一处延伸至牙骨质釉质界(CEJ)的近中边缘。研究样本包括来自史密森尼国家自然历史博物馆大型猿类藏品中的136个大型猿类标本,其中有41只大猩猩、25只黑猩猩和70只猩猩。我使用逻辑回归评估样本中这种缺损的患病率,并使用二项式概率检验来检测双侧性。上颌侧切牙的这种缺损是我在研究样本中观察到的第二常见的缺损(30.1%的个体受影响),并且与没有线性釉质发育不全(LEH)和窝状缺损的个体相比,有这些缺损的个体更易出现这种情况。在两侧上颌侧切牙均存在的标本中,该缺损大多是双侧性的。猩猩属(Pan)和婆罗洲猩猩属(Pongo)的个体比大猩猩属(Gorilla)的个体更易出现这种缺损。在婆罗洲猩猩属的不同物种中,侏儒猩猩(Pongo pygmaeus)比苏门答腊猩猩(Pongo abelii)更易出现这种缺损。在大猩猩属的不同亚种中,虽然西部大猩猩指名亚种(Gorilla gorilla gorilla)出现了这种缺损,而山地大猩猩(Gorilla gorilla beringei)没有,但差异不显著。在这个样本中没有明显的性别差异。这种缺损的患病率表明它不是遗传性的。双侧性趋势表明存在全身性原因,尽管牙齿间的高度特异性表明存在局部干扰,两者结合也是有可能的。