Suppr超能文献

在腹腔镜子宫肌瘤切除术中,学习曲线期间100例患者的病例量是否会使手术操作指标得到显著改善?

In Laparoscopic Myomectomy, Does a Caseload of 100 Patients During the Learning Curve Produce a Significant Improvement in Performance Measures?

作者信息

Shah Savan, Odejinmi Jimi F, Agarwal Nilesh

机构信息

Faculty of medicine, Imperial College London, Imperial College Road, London, SW7 2AZ UK.

Department of Obstetrician and Gynaecologist, Whipps Cross University Hospital, Whipps Cross Road, Leytonstone, London, E11 1NR UK.

出版信息

J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2016 Oct;66(Suppl 1):422-7. doi: 10.1007/s13224-015-0782-x. Epub 2015 Oct 16.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Laparoscopic myomectomy (LM) offers considerable advantages over open myomectomy; however, LM is technically complex and associated with a steep learning curve. Few studies have evaluated the effect of the learning curve, and the limitations of most of these studies were the number of women included and the multiplicity of surgeons undertaking the procedure. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of a caseload of 100 patients during the learning curve of a single experienced surgeon performing LM.

METHODS

A prospective comparative analysis of 200 consecutive cases of LM was conducted between December 2004 and March 2013. Outcomes of the first 100 procedures (Group A) were compared with the later 100 (Group B).

RESULTS

The mean age of the cohort was 39 years (24-54 years), with a mean BMI of 27 kg/m(2) (16-46). Both the groups were very similar with regard to the number, size and weight of myomas removed, the duration of surgery, and blood loss. More women were sent home within 24 h in the second group (27 vs 10.2 %, p = 0.002). Group A suffered significantly higher complication rates compared to Group B (11 vs 7, p < 0.05). The laparotomy conversion rate was 1.5 % (3 in Group A, none in Group B).

CONCLUSIONS

After a caseload of 100 patients during the learning curve, there was no difference in outcomes apart from increased confidence to discharge patients after 24 h and reduced complication rates. Thus, mere numbers do not influence the number/size of fibroids removed, operating time, or blood loss but do influence complication rates and post-operative discharge times.

摘要

目的

腹腔镜子宫肌瘤切除术(LM)相比开腹子宫肌瘤切除术具有诸多显著优势;然而,LM技术复杂且学习曲线陡峭。很少有研究评估学习曲线的影响,并且这些研究大多存在样本量有限以及参与手术的外科医生多样等局限性。本研究旨在评估在一名经验丰富的外科医生进行LM的学习曲线期间,100例病例的手术量所产生的影响。

方法

对200例连续的LM病例进行前瞻性对比分析,时间跨度为2004年12月至2013年3月。将前100例手术的结果(A组)与后100例(B组)进行比较。

结果

该队列的平均年龄为39岁(24 - 54岁),平均体重指数为27kg/m²(16 - 46)。两组在切除肌瘤的数量、大小和重量、手术时长以及失血量方面非常相似。第二组中有更多女性在24小时内出院(27%对10.2%,p = 0.002)。与B组相比,A组的并发症发生率显著更高(11例对7例,p < 0.05)。剖腹手术转化率为1.5%(A组3例,B组无)。

结论

在学习曲线期间完成100例病例的手术量后,除了24小时后出院信心增加和并发症发生率降低外,其他结果并无差异。因此,单纯的手术量并不影响切除肌瘤的数量/大小、手术时间或失血量,但会影响并发症发生率和术后出院时间。

相似文献

1
In Laparoscopic Myomectomy, Does a Caseload of 100 Patients During the Learning Curve Produce a Significant Improvement in Performance Measures?
J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2016 Oct;66(Suppl 1):422-7. doi: 10.1007/s13224-015-0782-x. Epub 2015 Oct 16.
2
Laparoscopic myomectomy: do size, number, and location of the myomas form limiting factors for laparoscopic myomectomy?
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2008 May-Jun;15(3):292-300. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2008.01.009.
3
Laparoendoscopic single-site myomectomy compared with conventional laparoscopic myomectomy: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial.
Fertil Steril. 2015 Nov;104(5):1325-31. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.07.1137. Epub 2015 Aug 8.
4
Comparison of robotic-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy outcomes with laparoscopic myomectomy.
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2013 Jan;287(1):91-6. doi: 10.1007/s00404-012-2530-0. Epub 2012 Aug 30.
7
Robotic-assisted laparoscopic complex myomectomy: a single medical center's experience.
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Feb;54(1):39-42. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2014.11.004.
8
Five-Year Lapsed: Review of Laparoscopic Myomectomy versus Open Myomectomy in Putrajaya Hospital.
Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther. 2018 Oct-Dec;7(4):161-166. doi: 10.4103/GMIT.GMIT_38_18. Epub 2018 Sep 26.
9
Laparoscopic radiofrequency volumetric thermal ablation of fibroids versus laparoscopic myomectomy.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2014 Jun;125(3):261-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.11.012. Epub 2014 Feb 28.
10
Italian multicenter study on complications of laparoscopic myomectomy.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2007 Jul-Aug;14(4):453-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2007.01.013.

本文引用的文献

2
Prospective evaluation of 125 consecutive laparoscopic myomectomies.
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2013 Aug;33(6):609-12. doi: 10.3109/01443615.2012.762348.
3
Peri-operative morbidity associated with abdominal myomectomy for very large fibroid uteri.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013 Apr;167(2):219-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2012.12.010. Epub 2013 Jan 3.
4
Learning curve of minimally invasive two-port laparoscopic myomectomy.
JSLS. 2012 Jan-Mar;16(1):112-8. doi: 10.4293/108680812X13291597716267.
5
Laparoscopic versus open myomectomy--a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2009 Jul;145(1):14-21. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2009.03.009. Epub 2009 Apr 23.
6
Learning curves in surgical practice.
Postgrad Med J. 2007 Dec;83(986):777-9. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.2007.057190.
8
Factors influencing laparoconversions during the learning curve of laparoscopic myomectomy.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2006;85(3):324-9. doi: 10.1080/00016340500438165.
9
Technical skills continue to improve beyond surgical training.
J Vasc Surg. 2006 Mar;43(3):539-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2005.09.047.
10
Minilaparotomy myomectomy: a minimally invasive alternative for the large fibroid uterus.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2005 May-Jun;12(3):275-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2005.03.009.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验