Cardiovascular Department, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, Taoyuan, Taiwan; College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Department of Public Health, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Sep 27;68(13):1389-1401. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.06.062.
It is unclear whether the non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant agents rivaroxaban and dabigatran are superior to warfarin for efficacy and safety outcomes in Asians with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF).
The aim of this study was to compare the risk for thromboembolic events, bleeding, and mortality associated with rivaroxaban and dabigatran versus warfarin in Asians with NVAF.
A nationwide retrospective cohort study was conducted of consecutive patients with NVAF taking rivaroxaban (n = 3,916), dabigatran (n = 5,921), or warfarin (n = 5,251) using data collected from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database between February 1, 2013 and December 31, 2013. The propensity score weighting method was used to balance covariates across study groups. Patients were followed until the first occurrence of any study outcome or the study end date (December 31, 2013).
A total of 3,425 (87%) and 5,301 (90%) patients were taking low-dose rivaroxaban (10 to 15 mg once daily) and dabigatran (110 mg twice daily), respectively. Compared with warfarin, both rivaroxaban and dabigatran significantly decreased the risk for ischemic stroke or systemic embolism (p = 0.0004 and p = 0.0006, respectively), intracranial hemorrhage (p = 0.0007 and p = 0.0005, respectively), and all-cause mortality (p < 0.0001 and p < 0.0001, respectively) during the short follow-up period. In comparing the 2 non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant agents with each other, no differences were found regarding risk for ischemic stroke or systemic embolism, intracranial hemorrhage, myocardial infarction, or mortality. Rivaroxaban carried a significantly higher risk for hospitalization for gastrointestinal bleeding than dabigatran (p = 0.0416), but on-treatment analysis showed that the risk for hospitalized gastrointestinal bleeding was similar between the 2 drugs (p = 0.5783).
In real-world practice among Asians with NVAF, both rivaroxaban and dabigatran were associated with reduced risk for ischemic stroke or systemic embolism, intracranial hemorrhage, and all-cause mortality without significantly increased risk for acute myocardial infarction or hospitalization for gastrointestinal bleeding compared with warfarin.
非维生素 K 拮抗剂口服抗凝剂利伐沙班和达比加群在亚洲非瓣膜性心房颤动(NVAF)患者中的疗效和安全性结局是否优于华法林尚不清楚。
本研究旨在比较亚洲 NVAF 患者使用利伐沙班和达比加群与华法林相关的血栓栓塞事件、出血和死亡率风险。
使用 2013 年 2 月 1 日至 2013 年 12 月 31 日从台湾全民健康保险研究数据库收集的数据,进行了一项全国性回顾性队列研究,纳入连续接受 NVAF 治疗的患者,分别使用利伐沙班(n=3916)、达比加群(n=5921)或华法林(n=5251)。采用倾向评分加权法平衡研究组间的协变量。患者随访至首次发生任何研究结局或研究结束日期(2013 年 12 月 31 日)。
共有 3425 名(87%)和 5301 名(90%)患者分别服用低剂量利伐沙班(10-15mg 每日 1 次)和达比加群(110mg 每日 2 次)。与华法林相比,利伐沙班和达比加群均显著降低缺血性卒中和全身性栓塞(p=0.0004 和 p=0.0006)、颅内出血(p=0.0007 和 p=0.0005)和全因死亡率(p<0.0001 和 p<0.0001)的风险,随访时间较短。比较这 2 种非维生素 K 拮抗剂口服抗凝剂,在缺血性卒中和全身性栓塞、颅内出血、心肌梗死或死亡率方面,两者之间无差异。与达比加群相比,利伐沙班因胃肠道出血住院的风险显著更高(p=0.0416),但治疗期间分析显示,这 2 种药物因胃肠道出血住院的风险相似(p=0.5783)。
在亚洲 NVAF 患者的真实世界实践中,与华法林相比,利伐沙班和达比加群均降低了缺血性卒中和全身性栓塞、颅内出血和全因死亡率的风险,且无明显增加急性心肌梗死或胃肠道出血住院的风险。