Giesel Frederik L, Schneider Florian, Kratochwil Clemens, Rath Daniel, Moltz Jan, Holland-Letz Tim, Kauczor Hans-Ulrich, Schwartz Lawrence H, Haberkorn Uwe, Flechsig Paul
Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Clinical Cooperation Unit, Department of Nuclear Medicine, DKFZ, Heidelberg, Germany.
J Nucl Med. 2017 Feb;58(2):282-287. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.116.179648. Epub 2016 Sep 22.
In patients with lung cancer (LC), malignant melanoma (MM), gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP NETs), and prostate cancer (PCA), lymph node (LN) staging is often performed by F-FDG PET/CT (LC and MM), Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT (GEP NET), and Ga-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen PET/CT (PCA) but is sometimes not accurate because of indeterminate PET findings. To better evaluate malignant LN infiltration, additional surrogate parameters, especially in cases with indeterminate PET findings, would be helpful. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether SUV in the PET examination might correlate with semiautomated density measurements of LNs in the CT component of the PET/CT examination.
After approval by the institutional review board, 1,022 LNs in the PET/CT examinations of 148 patients were retrospectively analyzed (LC: 327 LNs of 40 patients; MM: 224 LNs of 33 patients; GEP NET: 217 LNs of 35 patients; and PCA: 254 LNs of 40 patients). PET/CT was performed before surgery, biopsy, chemotherapy, or internal or external radiation therapy, according to the clinical schedule; patients with prior chemotherapy or radiation therapy were excluded. SUV analyses were based on uptake 60 min after tracer injection, and volumetric CT histogram analyses were based on the unenhanced CT images of the PET/CT scan.
PET findings were considered positive or negative on the basis of SUV in the LN compared with that in the blood pool; histologic confirmation was not available. Of the 1,022 LNs, 331 were PET-positive (3 times the SUV of the blood pool), 86 were PET-indeterminate (1-3 times the SUV of the blood pool), and 605 were PET-negative (less than the SUV of the blood pool). PET-positive LNs had significantly higher CT densities than PET-negative LNs, irrespective of the type of cancer.
CT density measurements of LNs in patients with LC, MM, GEP NET, and PCA correlated withF-FDG uptake, Ga-DOTATOC uptake, and Ga-PSMA uptake, respectively, and might therefore serve as an additional surrogate parameter for differentiating between malignant and benign LNs. The use of a 7.5-Hounsfield unit CT density threshold to differentiate between malignant and benign LN infiltration and 20 Hounsfield units to exclude benign LN processes might be possible in clinical routine and would be especially helpful for PET-indeterminate LNs.
在肺癌(LC)、恶性黑色素瘤(MM)、胃肠胰神经内分泌肿瘤(GEP NETs)和前列腺癌(PCA)患者中,淋巴结(LN)分期通常通过F-FDG PET/CT(LC和MM)、Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT(GEP NET)和Ga标记的前列腺特异性膜抗原PET/CT(PCA)进行,但由于PET检查结果不确定,有时并不准确。为了更好地评估恶性LN浸润,额外的替代参数,特别是在PET检查结果不确定的情况下,将有所帮助。本研究的目的是评估PET检查中的SUV是否与PET/CT检查的CT部分中LN的半自动密度测量相关。
经机构审查委员会批准后,对148例患者的PET/CT检查中的1022个LN进行回顾性分析(LC:40例患者的327个LN;MM:33例患者的224个LN;GEP NET:35例患者的217个LN;PCA:40例患者的254个LN)。根据临床日程安排,在手术、活检、化疗或内、外放疗前进行PET/CT检查;排除先前接受过化疗或放疗的患者。SUV分析基于示踪剂注射后60分钟的摄取情况,容积CT直方图分析基于PET/CT扫描的未增强CT图像。
根据LN中的SUV与血池中的SUV比较,PET检查结果被认为是阳性或阴性;无法获得组织学证实。在1022个LN中,331个PET阳性(血池SUV的3倍),86个PET不确定(血池SUV的1 - 3倍),605个PET阴性(低于血池SUV)。无论癌症类型如何,PET阳性的LN的CT密度显著高于PET阴性的LN。
LC、MM、GEP NET和PCA患者的LN的CT密度测量分别与F-FDG摄取、Ga-DOTATOC摄取和Ga-PSMA摄取相关,因此可能作为区分恶性和良性LN的额外替代参数。在临床常规中,使用7.5亨氏单位的CT密度阈值来区分恶性和良性LN浸润以及20亨氏单位来排除良性LN病变可能是可行的,这对PET不确定的LN尤其有帮助。