Inamoto Yoshihiro, Kimura Fumihiko, Kanda Junya, Sugita Junichi, Ikegame Kazuhiro, Nakasone Hideki, Nannya Yasuhito, Uchida Naoyuki, Fukuda Takahiro, Yoshioka Kosuke, Ozawa Yukiyasu, Kawano Ichiro, Atsuta Yoshiko, Kato Koji, Ichinohe Tatsuo, Inoue Masami, Teshima Takanori
Department of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
Division of Hematology, National Defense Medical College, Tokorozawa, Japan.
Haematologica. 2016 Dec;101(12):1592-1602. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2016.149427. Epub 2016 Aug 4.
Graft-versus-host disease-free relapse-free survival, which is defined as the absence of grade III-IV acute graft-versus-host disease, systemically treated chronic graft-versus-host disease, relapse, and death, is a novel, meaningful composite end point for clinical trials. To characterize risk factors and differences in graft-versus-host disease-free relapse-free survival according to a variety of graft sources, we analyzed 23,302 patients with hematologic malignancy that had a first allogeneic transplantation from 2000 through 2013 using the Japanese national transplant registry database. The 1-year graft-versus-host disease-free relapse-free survival rate was 41% in all patients. The rate was higher after bone marrow transplantation than after peripheral blood stem cell transplantation due to the lower risks of III-IV acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease. The rate was highest after HLA-matched sibling bone marrow transplantation. The rate after single cord blood transplantation was comparable to that after HLA-matched unrelated bone marrow transplantation among patients aged 20 years or under, and was comparable or better than other alternative graft sources among patients aged 21 years or over, due to the low risk of chronic graft-versus-host disease. Other factors associated with better graft-versus-host disease-free relapse-free survival include female patients, antithymocyte globulin prophylaxis (for standard-risk disease), recent years of transplantation, sex combinations other than from a female donor to a male patient, the absence of prior autologous transplantation, myeloablative conditioning, negative cytomegalovirus serostatus, and tacrolimus-based prophylaxis. These results provide important information to guide the choice of graft sources and are benchmarks for future graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis studies.
无移植物抗宿主病无复发生存期被定义为不存在III - IV级急性移植物抗宿主病、经系统治疗的慢性移植物抗宿主病、复发及死亡,它是一种用于临床试验的新型且有意义的复合终点。为了根据多种移植物来源来描述无移植物抗宿主病无复发生存期的危险因素及差异,我们利用日本国家移植登记数据库分析了2000年至2013年期间首次接受异基因移植的23302例血液系统恶性肿瘤患者。所有患者的1年无移植物抗宿主病无复发生存率为41%。由于III - IV级急性和慢性移植物抗宿主病的风险较低,骨髓移植后的生存率高于外周血干细胞移植后的生存率。HLA配型相合的同胞骨髓移植后的生存率最高。在20岁及以下的患者中,单份脐血移植后的生存率与HLA配型相合的非亲缘骨髓移植后的生存率相当,而在21岁及以上的患者中,单份脐血移植后的生存率与其他替代移植物来源的生存率相当或更高,这是因为慢性移植物抗宿主病的风险较低。与更好的无移植物抗宿主病无复发生存期相关的其他因素包括女性患者、抗胸腺细胞球蛋白预防(用于标准风险疾病)、近年进行移植、除女性供者至男性受者之外的性别组合、无既往自体移植、清髓性预处理、巨细胞病毒血清学阴性状态以及基于他克莫司的预防。这些结果为指导移植物来源的选择提供了重要信息,并且是未来移植物抗宿主病预防研究的基准。