Carceller Fernando, Bautista Francisco J, Jiménez Irene, Hladun-Álvaro Raquel, Giraud Cécile, Bergamaschi Luca, Dandapani Madhumita, Aerts Isabelle, Doz François, Frappaz Didier, Casanova Michela, Morland Bruce, Hargrave Darren R, Marshall Lynley V, Vassal Gilles, Pearson Andrew D J, Geoerger Birgit, Moreno Lucas
Paediatric and Adolescent Drug Development, Children and Young People's Unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Division of Clinical Studies and Cancer Therapeutics, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Department of Paediatric and Adolescent Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Sud, Villejuif, France.
Eur J Cancer. 2016 Nov;67:130-140. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2016.08.008. Epub 2016 Sep 21.
Dose-finding trials are fundamental to develop novel drugs for children and adolescents with advanced cancer. It is crucial to maximise individual benefit, whilst ensuring adequate assessment of key study end-points. We assessed prognostic factors of survival in paediatric phase I trials, including two predictive scores validated in adult oncology: the Royal Marsden Hospital (RMH) and the MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC) scores.
Data of patients with solid tumours aged <18 years at enrolment in their first dose-finding trial between 2000 and 2014 at eight centres of the Innovative Therapies for Children with Cancer European consortium were collected. Survival distributions were compared using log-rank test and Cox regression analyses.
Overall, 248 patients were evaluated: median age, 11.2 years (range 1.0-17.9); 46% had central nervous system (CNS) tumours and 54% extra-CNS tumours. Complete responses were observed in 2.1%, partial responses in 7.2% and stable disease in 25.9%. Median overall survival (OS) was 6.3 months (95% confidence interval, 5.2-7.4). Lansky/Karnofsky ≤80%, no school/work attendance, elevated creatinine and RMH score ≥1 correlated with worse OS in the multivariate analysis. The RMH and MDACC scores correlated with OS in adolescents (12-17 years), p = 0.002, but not in children (2-11 years).
Performance status of 90-100% and school/work attendance at enrolment are strong indicators of longer OS in paediatric phase I trials. Adult predictive scores correlate with survival in adolescents. These findings provide a useful orientation about potential prognosis and could lead in the future to more paediatric-adapted eligibility criteria in early-phase trials.
剂量探索试验对于为患有晚期癌症的儿童和青少年研发新型药物至关重要。在确保对关键研究终点进行充分评估的同时,最大化个体获益至关重要。我们评估了儿科I期试验中的生存预后因素,包括在成人肿瘤学中验证的两个预测评分:皇家马斯登医院(RMH)评分和MD安德森癌症中心(MDACC)评分。
收集了2000年至2014年间在欧洲儿童癌症创新疗法联盟的八个中心参加首次剂量探索试验的年龄<18岁的实体瘤患者的数据。使用对数秩检验和Cox回归分析比较生存分布。
总体上,评估了248例患者:中位年龄11.2岁(范围1.0 - 17.9岁);46%患有中枢神经系统(CNS)肿瘤,54%患有CNS外肿瘤。观察到完全缓解率为2.1%,部分缓解率为7.2%,疾病稳定率为25.9%。中位总生存期(OS)为6.3个月(95%置信区间,5.2 - 7.4)。在多变量分析中,兰斯基/卡诺夫斯基评分≤80%、未上学/工作、肌酐升高以及RMH评分≥1与较差的OS相关。RMH和MDACC评分与青少年(12 - 17岁)的OS相关,p = 0.002,但与儿童(2 - 11岁)的OS无关。
在儿科I期试验中,90 - 100%的体能状态和入组时上学/工作是OS较长的有力指标。成人预测评分与青少年的生存相关。这些发现为潜在预后提供了有用的指导,并可能在未来导致早期试验中更适合儿科的入选标准。