Bond Raymond R, Finlay Dewar D, McLaughlin James, Guldenring Daniel, Cairns Andrew, Kennedy Alan, Deans Robert, Waldo Albert L, Peace Aaron
Ulster University, Northern Ireland, UK.
Ulster University, Northern Ireland, UK.
J Electrocardiol. 2016 Nov-Dec;49(6):911-918. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2016.08.009. Epub 2016 Aug 18.
The CardioQuick Patch® (CQP) has been developed to assist operators in accurately positioning precordial electrodes during 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) acquisition. This study describes the CQP design and assesses the device in comparison to conventional electrode application.
Twenty ECG technicians were recruited and a total of 60 ECG acquisitions were performed on the same patient model over four phases: (1) all participants applied single electrodes to the patient; (2) all participants were then re-trained on electrode placement and on how to use the CQP; (3) participants were randomly divided into two groups, the standard group applied single electrodes and the CQP group used the CQP; (4) after a one day interval, the same participants returned to carry out the same procedure on the same patient (measuring intra-practitioner variability). Accuracy was measured with reference to pre-marked correct locations using ultra violet ink. NASA-TLK was used to measure cognitive workload and the Systematic Usability Scale (SUS) was used to quantify the usability of the CQP.
There was a large difference between the minimum time taken to complete each approach (CQP=38.58s vs. 65.96s). The standard group exhibited significant levels of electrode placement error (V1=25.35mm±29.33, V2=18.1mm±24.49, V3=38.65mm±15.57, V4=37.73mm±12.14, V5=35.75mm±15.61, V6=44.15mm±14.32). The CQP group had statistically greater accuracy when placing five of the six electrodes (V1=6.68mm±8.53 [p<0.001], V2=8.8mm±9.64 [p=0.122], V3=6.83mm±8.99 [p<0.001], V4=14.90mm±11.76 [p<0.001], V5=8.63mm±10.70 [p<0.001], V6=18.13mm±14.37 [p<0.001]). There was less intra-practitioner variability when using the CQP on the same patient model. NASA TLX revealed that the CQP did increase the cognitive workload (CQP group=16.51%±8.11 vs. 12.22%±8.07 [p=0.251]). The CQP also achieved a high SUS score of 91±7.28.
The CQP significantly improved the reproducibility and accuracy of placing precordial electrodes V1, V3-V6 with little additional cognitive effort, and with a high degree of usability.
CardioQuick Patch®(CQP)已被开发用于协助操作人员在进行12导联心电图(ECG)采集时准确放置胸前电极。本研究描述了CQP的设计,并与传统电极应用方式相比对该设备进行了评估。
招募了20名心电图技术人员,在同一患者模型上分四个阶段共进行了60次心电图采集:(1)所有参与者将单个电极应用于患者;(2)然后对所有参与者进行电极放置以及如何使用CQP的再培训;(3)参与者被随机分为两组,标准组应用单个电极,CQP组使用CQP;(4)间隔一天后,相同的参与者回来在同一患者身上执行相同程序(测量个体内变异性)。通过参考使用紫外线墨水预先标记的正确位置来测量准确性。使用NASA-TLK来测量认知工作量,并使用系统可用性量表(SUS)来量化CQP的可用性。
完成每种方法所需的最短时间之间存在很大差异(CQP = 38.58秒对65.96秒)。标准组表现出显著水平的电极放置误差(V1 = 25.35mm±29.33,V2 = 18.1mm±24.49,V3 = 38.65mm±15.57,V4 = 37.73mm±12.14,V5 = 35.75mm±15.61,V6 = 44.15mm±14.32)。CQP组在放置六个电极中的五个时具有统计学上更高的准确性(V1 = 6.68mm±8.53 [p < 0.001],V2 = 8.8mm±9.64 [p = 0.122],V3 = 6.83mm±8.99 [p < 0.001],V4 = 14.90mm±11.76 [p < 0.001],V5 = 8.63mm±10.70 [p < 0.001],V6 = 18.13mm±14.37 [p < 0.001])。在同一患者模型上使用CQP时个体内变异性较小。NASA TLX显示CQP确实增加了认知工作量(CQP组 = 16.51%±8.11对12.22%±8.07 [p = 0.251])。CQP还获得了91±7.28的高SUS评分。
CQP显著提高了胸前电极V1、V3 - V6放置的可重复性和准确性,几乎无需额外的认知努力,并且具有高度的可用性。