Clark Jillian M R, Marszalek Jacob M, Bennett Kymberley K, Harry Kadie M, Howarter Alisha D, Eways Kalon R, Reed Karla S
Department of Psychology, University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, MO, United States; College of Health Professions, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States.
Division of Counseling and Educational Psychology, School of Education, University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, MO, United States.
J Psychosom Res. 2016 Oct;89:91-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2016.08.007. Epub 2016 Aug 12.
Individuals with cardiovascular disease (CVD) experience greater rates of distress symptoms, such as anxiety and depressive symptoms, than the general population. These psychological outcomes have been linked to greater risk for negative outcomes following a cardiac event; however, research examining the relationship between specific components of anxiety and outcomes in CVD is limited. Further, prior research has not investigated the structure of anxiety symptoms in CVD. This study sought to compare previously established one, two, and four-factor models of the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) in individuals enrolled in cardiac rehabilitation (CR).
Our sample included 208 individuals with CVD recruited during enrollment in a phase II CR program. Participants completed the BAI at enrollment in CR (Time 1) and again 12weeks later at CR completion (Time 2, n=151).
Consistent with prior literature, 41% of our sample reported at least mild symptoms of anxiety (BAI>8), and the BAI proved to be a reliable measure within this sample (α=0.89). Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) results indicated that a second-order model with four first order factors, consisting of cognitive, autonomic, neuromotor, and panic components, fit our data well. A multi-group CFA approach supported measurement invariance across time.
These results suggest that anxiety following CVD can be evaluated based on cognitive, autonomic, neuromotor, and panic components as well as the encompassing anxiety construct.
与普通人群相比,心血管疾病(CVD)患者出现焦虑和抑郁症状等痛苦症状的比例更高。这些心理结果与心脏事件后出现负面结果的更高风险相关;然而,研究CVD中焦虑的特定组成部分与结果之间关系的研究有限。此外,先前的研究尚未调查CVD中焦虑症状的结构。本研究旨在比较先前建立的针对参加心脏康复(CR)的个体的贝克焦虑量表(BAI)的单因素、双因素和四因素模型。
我们的样本包括在II期CR项目招募期间招募的208名CVD患者。参与者在CR入组时(时间1)完成BAI,12周后在CR结束时再次完成(时间2,n = 151)。
与先前文献一致,我们样本中的41%报告至少有轻度焦虑症状(BAI>8),并且BAI在该样本中被证明是一种可靠的测量方法(α = 0.89)。验证性因素分析(CFA)结果表明,具有四个一阶因素(包括认知、自主神经、神经运动和惊恐成分)的二阶模型与我们的数据拟合良好。多组CFA方法支持跨时间的测量不变性。
这些结果表明,CVD后的焦虑可以基于认知、自主神经、神经运动和惊恐成分以及总体焦虑结构进行评估。