Rozenberg Aleksandr, Weinstein Jonathan C, Flanders Adam E, Sharma Pranshu
Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, 1087 Main Building, 132 S. 10th Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA.
Emerg Radiol. 2017 Feb;24(1):55-59. doi: 10.1007/s10140-016-1445-7. Epub 2016 Sep 23.
Reformatted CTs of the thoracic and lumbar spine (CT T/L) from CTs of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis (CT body) may be performed for screening the thoracolumbar spine in patients sustaining blunt trauma. The purpose of this study was to determine whether there was a difference in the rate of detection of spinal fractures on CTs of the body compared to the reformatted T/L spine. A secondary endpoint was to evaluate whether cases dictated by trainees improved fracture detection rate. We reviewed the records of 250 consecutive blunt trauma patients that received CTs of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis (CT body) with concurrent CT T/L reformats. Each report was reviewed to determine if there was a thoracolumbar fracture and whether a trainee had been involved in interpreting the CT body. If a fracture was identified on either report, then the number, type, and location of each fracture was documented. Sixty-nine fractures, from a total of 38 patients, were identified on either the CT of the body or the CT T/L. Sensitivity for CT body interpretations was 94 % (95 % CI: 86-98 %) compared to a 97 % (95 % CI: 89-100 %) sensitivity for the CT T/L (p > 0.5). Although the sensitivity was 97 % (95 % CI: 88-100 %) when a trainee was involved in interpreting the body CT, there was no statistically significant improvement. The results suggest that with careful scrutiny most spine fractures can be diagnosed on body CT images without the addition of spine reformats. The most commonly missed finding is an isolated non-displaced transverse process fracture, which does not require surgical intervention and does not alter clinical management. The results suggest that thin section reformats do not need to be routinely ordered in screening blunt trauma patients, unless a bony abnormality is identified on the thicker section body CT images.
对于钝性创伤患者,可通过对胸部、腹部和骨盆CT(全身CT)进行重新格式化处理,获得胸腰椎CT(胸腰椎CT),以筛查胸腰椎。本研究的目的是确定全身CT与重新格式化后的胸腰椎CT在脊柱骨折检出率上是否存在差异。次要终点是评估实习医生判读的病例是否提高了骨折检出率。我们回顾了250例连续钝性创伤患者的记录,这些患者均接受了胸部、腹部和骨盆CT(全身CT)以及同步的胸腰椎CT重新格式化处理。每份报告都经过审查,以确定是否存在胸腰椎骨折,以及实习医生是否参与了解读全身CT。如果在任何一份报告中发现骨折,则记录每处骨折的数量、类型和位置。在全身CT或胸腰椎CT上共识别出69处骨折,涉及38名患者。全身CT判读的敏感性为94%(95%可信区间:86-98%),而胸腰椎CT的敏感性为97%(95%可信区间:89-100%)(p>0.5)。尽管实习医生参与解读全身CT时敏感性为97%(95%可信区间:88-100%),但并无统计学上的显著改善。结果表明,经过仔细检查,大多数脊柱骨折可在全身CT图像上诊断出来,无需额外进行脊柱重新格式化处理。最常漏诊的是孤立的无移位横突骨折,这种骨折无需手术干预,也不会改变临床治疗方案。结果表明,除非在较厚层面的全身CT图像上发现骨质异常,否则在筛查钝性创伤患者时无需常规进行薄层重新格式化处理。