Suppr超能文献

社区环境中由药剂师主导的药物审查:系统评价综述

Pharmacist-led medication review in community settings: An overview of systematic reviews.

作者信息

Jokanovic Natali, Tan Edwin Ck, Sudhakaran Sreeja, Kirkpatrick Carl M, Dooley Michael J, Ryan-Atwood Taliesin E, Bell J Simon

机构信息

Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Melbourne, Australia; Pharmacy Department, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.

Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

Res Social Adm Pharm. 2017 Jul-Aug;13(4):661-685. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2016.08.005. Epub 2016 Aug 28.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pharmacist-led medication review is a collaborative service which aims to identify and resolve medication-related problems.

OBJECTIVE

To critically evaluate published systematic reviews relevant to pharmacist-led medication reviews in community settings.

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (IPA), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR) were searched from 1995 to December 2015. Systematic reviews of all study designs and outcomes were considered. Methodological quality was assessed using the 11-item Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) tool. Systematic reviews of moderate or high quality (AMSTAR ≥ 4) were included in the data synthesis. Data extraction and quality assessment was performed independently by two investigators.

RESULTS

Of the 35 relevant systematic reviews identified, 24 were of moderate and seven of high quality and were included in the data synthesis. The largest overall numbers of unique primary research studies with favorable outcomes were for diabetes control (78% of studies reporting the outcome), blood pressure control (74%), cholesterol (63%), medication adherence (56%) and medication management (47%). Significant reductions in medication and/or healthcare costs were reported in 35% of primary research studies. Meta-analysis was performed in 12 systematic reviews. Results from the meta-analyses suggested positive impacts on glycosylated hemoglobin, blood pressure, cholesterol, and number and appropriateness of medications. Conflicting findings were reported in relation to hospitalization. No meta-analyses reported reduced mortality.

CONCLUSION

Moderate and high quality systematic reviews support the value of pharmacist-led medication review for a range of clinical outcomes. Further research including more rigorous cost analyses are required to determine the impact of pharmacist-led medication reviews on humanistic and economic outcomes. Future systematic reviews should consider the inclusion of both qualitative and quantitative studies to comprehensively evaluate medication review.

摘要

背景

由药剂师主导的药物评估是一项协作性服务,旨在识别并解决与药物相关的问题。

目的

严格评估已发表的与社区环境中由药剂师主导的药物评估相关的系统评价。

方法

检索了1995年至2015年12月期间的MEDLINE、EMBASE、国际药学文摘(IPA)、护理学与健康相关文献累积索引(CINAHL)以及Cochrane系统评价数据库(CDSR)。纳入了所有研究设计和结局的系统评价。使用11项多系统评价评估工具(AMSTAR)对方法学质量进行评估。数据综合分析纳入了中等质量或高质量(AMSTAR≥4)的系统评价。由两名研究人员独立进行数据提取和质量评估。

结果

在识别出的35篇相关系统评价中,24篇为中等质量,7篇为高质量,并纳入了数据综合分析。具有有利结局的独特原始研究数量总体最多的是糖尿病控制(78%的研究报告了该结局)、血压控制(74%)、胆固醇(63%)、药物依从性(56%)和药物管理(47%)。35%的原始研究报告了药物和/或医疗保健成本的显著降低。12篇系统评价进行了荟萃分析。荟萃分析结果表明,对糖化血红蛋白、血压、胆固醇以及药物数量和合理性有积极影响。关于住院治疗的结果存在相互矛盾的报道。没有荟萃分析报告死亡率降低。

结论

中等质量和高质量的系统评价支持由药剂师主导的药物评估对一系列临床结局的价值。需要进一步开展包括更严格成本分析在内的研究,以确定由药剂师主导的药物评估对人文和经济结局的影响。未来的系统评价应考虑纳入定性和定量研究,以全面评估药物评估。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验