Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China.
Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China; Center for Excellence in Urban Atmospheric Environment, Institute of Urban Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xiamen, 361021, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China.
Sci Total Environ. 2017 Jan 1;575:1034-1040. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.09.166. Epub 2016 Sep 22.
NO and NO emissions, the water usage and grain yields of a maize field in the North China Plain (NCP) under traditional flood irrigation, drip irrigation and drip fertigation were compared. With respect to the flood irrigation treatment, NO emissions were reduced by 13.8% in the drip irrigation treatment and 7.7% in the drip fertigation treatment. NO emissions were reduced to 16.7% in the drip irrigation treatment but increased by 21.7% in the drip fertigation treatment. The molar ratios of NO/NO within 2days after each fertilization event were evidently greater from the drip fertigation treatment than from the flood irrigation treatment, indicating that nitrification was more intensive in the drip fertigation treatment than in the treatment of flood irrigation. Compared with the flood irrigation treatment, evident increase of the maize yields in the drip irrigation treatment (28%) and the drip fertigation treatment (3.7%) were found. Although the drip fertigation treatment could evidently increase NO emission, the 40% water reduction in drip fertigation is of great importance for the sustainable development of agriculture in the NCP where water resources are extremely limited. To mitigate NO emissions from agricultural fields in the NCP with drip fertigation, the addition of a nitrification inhibitor combined with N or nitrate fertilizer was recommended.
对华北平原(NCP)传统漫灌、滴灌和滴灌施肥条件下玉米田的 NO 和 NO 排放、耗水量和粮食产量进行了比较。与漫灌处理相比,滴灌处理使 NO 排放减少了 13.8%,滴灌施肥处理减少了 7.7%。NO 排放减少了 16.7%,但在滴灌施肥处理中增加了 21.7%。在每次施肥后 2 天内,NO/NO 的摩尔比明显高于滴灌施肥处理,表明滴灌施肥处理中的硝化作用比漫灌处理更为强烈。与漫灌处理相比,滴灌处理(28%)和滴灌施肥处理(3.7%)的玉米产量明显增加。尽管滴灌施肥处理会明显增加 NO 排放,但在水资源极度短缺的华北平原,滴灌施肥减少 40%的用水量对农业的可持续发展具有重要意义。为了减轻滴灌施肥农田的 NO 排放,可以建议添加硝化抑制剂与 N 或硝酸盐肥料结合使用。