Rousseau Eric, Melo-Silva César Augusto, Gakwaya Simon, Sériès Frédéric
Unité de Recherche en Pneumologie, Centre de Recherche, Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de Québec, Université Laval, Québec, Québec City, Canada; and.
Laboratory of Respiratory Physiology, University of Brasília (UnB), Brasília, Federal District, Brazil.
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2016 Nov 1;121(5):1217-1225. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00487.2015. Epub 2016 Sep 29.
We tested the hypothesis that stimulating the genioglossus by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) during the ascendant portion of the inspiratory flow of airflow-limited breaths would sustain the recruitment of upper airway dilator muscles over time and improve airway dynamics without arousing obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) patients. In a cross-sectional design, nine OSA patients underwent a rTMS trial during stable non-rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep. Submental muscle motor threshold (SUB) and motor-evoked potential were evaluated during wakefulness and sleep. During NREM sleep, maximal inspiratory flow, inspiratory volume, inspiratory time, shifts of electroencephalogram frequency, and pulse rate variability were assessed under three different stimulation paradigms completed at 1.2 sleep SUB stimulation output: 1) 5Hz-08 (stimulation frequency: 5 Hz; duration of train stimulation: 0.8 s); 2) 25Hz-02 (stimulation frequency: 25 Hz; duration of train stimulation: 0.2 s); and 3) 25Hz-04 (stimulation frequency: 25 Hz; duration of train stimulation: 0.4 s). SUB increased during NREM sleep (wakefulness: 23.8 ± 6.1%; NREM: 26.8 ± 5.2%; = 0.001). Two distinct airflow patterns were observed in response to rTMS: with and without initial airflow drops, without other airflow variables change regardless the stimulation paradigm applied. Finally, rTMS-induced cortical and/or autonomic arousal were observed in 36, 26, and 35% of all delivered rTMS trains during 5Hz-08, 25Hz-02, and 25Hz-04 stimulation paradigms, respectively. In conclusion, rTMS does not provide any airflow improvement of flow-limited breaths as seen with nonrepetitive TMS of upper airway dilator muscles. However, rTMS trains were free of arousals in the majority of cases.
在气流受限呼吸的吸气气流上升阶段,通过重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)刺激颏舌肌,随着时间的推移会维持上气道扩张肌的募集,并改善气道动力学,同时不会唤醒阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)患者。在一项横断面设计中,9名OSA患者在稳定的非快速眼动(NREM)睡眠期间接受了rTMS试验。在清醒和睡眠期间评估颏下肌运动阈值(SUB)和运动诱发电位。在NREM睡眠期间,在以1.2倍睡眠SUB刺激输出完成的三种不同刺激模式下,评估最大吸气流量、吸气量、吸气时间、脑电图频率变化和心率变异性:1)5Hz - 08(刺激频率:5Hz;串刺激持续时间:0.8秒);2)25Hz - 02(刺激频率:25Hz;串刺激持续时间:0.2秒);3)25Hz - 04(刺激频率:25Hz;串刺激持续时间:0.4秒)。SUB在NREM睡眠期间增加(清醒时:23.8±6.1%;NREM时:26.8±5.2%;P = 0.001)。观察到对rTMS有两种不同的气流模式反应:有和没有初始气流下降,无论应用何种刺激模式,其他气流变量均无变化。最后,在5Hz - 08、25Hz - 02和25Hz - 04刺激模式下,分别在所有给予的rTMS串刺激中,有36%、26%和35%观察到rTMS诱发的皮质和/或自主神经唤醒。总之,与对上气道扩张肌进行非重复经颅磁刺激时所见到的情况一样,rTMS并未改善气流受限呼吸的气流。然而,在大多数情况下,rTMS串刺激不会引起唤醒。