• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种多感官字母表音方法对学习障碍大学生的有效性。

The effectiveness of a multisensory alphabetic phonetic approach with college students who are learning disabled.

作者信息

Guyer B P, Sabatino D

出版信息

J Learn Disabil. 1989 Aug-Sep;22(7):430-4. doi: 10.1177/002221948902200707.

DOI:10.1177/002221948902200707
PMID:2769062
Abstract

College students diagnosed as learning disabled were studied to determine whether they would make more progress in a summer program if taught by an adaptation of the Orton-Gillingham (O-G) approach. Progress of those exposed to this approach was compared to progress of those exposed to (a) a nonphonetic approach or (b) no educational activity. Pre- and posttest results are reported for the Wide Range Achievement Test-Revised and Woodcock Reading Mastery Tests. The subjects were 30 college students aged 17 to 24, who were diagnosed as LD. They were divided into groups of 10 and exposed to the indicated educational intervention. The O-G group was found to achieve statistically significant improvement in reading when compared to the group using the nonphonetic approach or no educational activity. No statistically significant difference was noted between the latter two groups. This study indicates that a modified O-G approach is useful in the teaching of reading to college students who are LD.

摘要

对被诊断为有学习障碍的大学生进行了研究,以确定如果采用奥顿-吉林厄姆(O-G)方法的改编版进行教学,他们在暑期课程中是否会取得更大的进步。将采用这种方法的学生的进步与采用(a)非语音方法或(b)不进行教育活动的学生的进步进行了比较。报告了针对广泛成就测验修订版和伍德科克阅读能力测验的前测和后测结果。研究对象是30名年龄在17至24岁之间、被诊断为有学习障碍的大学生。他们被分成每组10人的小组,并接受指定的教育干预。结果发现,与采用非语音方法或不进行教育活动的小组相比,O-G小组在阅读方面取得了统计学上显著的进步。后两组之间没有发现统计学上的显著差异。这项研究表明,改良后的O-G方法对有学习障碍的大学生阅读教学很有用。

相似文献

1
The effectiveness of a multisensory alphabetic phonetic approach with college students who are learning disabled.一种多感官字母表音方法对学习障碍大学生的有效性。
J Learn Disabil. 1989 Aug-Sep;22(7):430-4. doi: 10.1177/002221948902200707.
2
Effects of summer instruction on reading achievement regression of learning disabled students.暑期教学对学习障碍学生阅读成绩退步的影响。
J Learn Disabil. 1982 Aug-Sep;15(7):409-13. doi: 10.1177/002221948201500707.
3
An evaluation of the dyslexia training program: a multisensory method for promoting reading in students with reading disabilities.阅读障碍训练项目评估:一种促进阅读障碍学生阅读的多感官方法。
J Learn Disabil. 1998 Mar-Apr;31(2):140-7. doi: 10.1177/002221949803100204.
4
Evaluation of the effectiveness of a literacy intervention programme on enhancing learning outcomes for secondary students with dyslexia in Hong Kong.评估一项扫盲干预计划对提高香港诵读困难中学生学习成果的有效性。
Dyslexia. 2019 Aug;25(3):296-317. doi: 10.1002/dys.1626. Epub 2019 Jul 7.
5
A demonstration of the concept of 'hyperlearning'.
J Learn Disabil. 1981 Jan;14(1):19-21, 47. doi: 10.1177/002221948101400109.
6
Instrument for locating students with suspected learning disabilities: a quantitative approach.
Int J Rehabil Res. 1997 Jun;20(2):169-81. doi: 10.1097/00004356-199706000-00006.
7
A meta-analysis of morphological interventions: effects on literacy achievement of children with literacy difficulties.一项形态干预的荟萃分析:对有阅读困难的儿童的读写成绩的影响。
Ann Dyslexia. 2010 Dec;60(2):183-208. doi: 10.1007/s11881-010-0041-x. Epub 2010 Aug 27.
8
Effectiveness of a test-taking strategy on achievement in essay tests for students with learning disabilities.一种应试策略对学习障碍学生在论述题测试中成绩的有效性。
J Learn Disabil. 2009 Jan-Feb;42(1):14-23. doi: 10.1177/0022219408326218.
9
Computer-assisted remedial reading intervention for school beginners at risk for reading disability.计算机辅助补救性阅读干预对有阅读障碍风险的学校初学者的帮助。
Child Dev. 2011 May-Jun;82(3):1013-28. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01580.x. Epub 2011 Mar 18.
10
Longitudinal outcomes of an individualized and intensive reading intervention for third grade students.个体化和强化阅读干预对三年级学生的纵向结果。
Dyslexia. 2019 Aug;25(3):227-245. doi: 10.1002/dys.1616. Epub 2019 Apr 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Bridging the Gap in Adult Dyslexia Research: Assessing the Efficacy of a Linguistic Intervention on Literacy Skills.弥合成人诵读困难研究的差距:评估语言干预对读写能力的效果。
Ann Dyslexia. 2025 Apr;75(1):42-70. doi: 10.1007/s11881-024-00314-x. Epub 2024 Sep 23.
2
A study of medical students and physicians referred for learning disabilities.医学学生和医生学习障碍转诊研究。
Ann Dyslexia. 1995 Jan;45(1):233-45. doi: 10.1007/BF02648220.
3
Spelling improvement for college students who are dyslexic.拼写改善对有阅读障碍的大学生。
Ann Dyslexia. 1993 Dec;43(1):186-93. doi: 10.1007/BF02928181.
4
The effects of multisensory structured language instruction on native language and foreign language aptitude skills of at-risk high school foreign language learners.多感官结构语言教学对高危高中外语学习者母语和外语能力倾向技能的影响。
Ann Dyslexia. 1992 Dec;42(1):25-53. doi: 10.1007/BF02654937.
5
Testing the effectiveness of the project success summer program for adult dyslexics.测试项目成功暑期计划对成年阅读障碍者的有效性。
Ann Dyslexia. 1992 Dec;42(1):1-24. doi: 10.1007/BF02654936.
6
Use of an orton-gillingham approach to teach a foreign language to dyslexic/learning-disabled students: Explicit teaching of phonology in a second language.运用奥格登-吉尔登方法教授外语给诵读困难/学习障碍学生:在第二语言中进行语音学的显性教学。
Ann Dyslexia. 1991 Jan;41(1):96-118. doi: 10.1007/BF02648080.