• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对在医疗评估前离开急诊科的患者的特征、意见和结果进行的一项比较研究。

A comparative study of patient characteristics, opinions, and outcomes, for patients who leave the emergency department before medical assessment.

作者信息

Fraser Jacqueline, Atkinson Paul, Gedmintas Audra, Howlett Michael, McCloskey Rose, French James

机构信息

*Department of Emergency Medicine,Dalhousie University,Saint John,NB.

†Horizon Health Network,Saint John Regional Hospital,Saint John,NB.

出版信息

CJEM. 2017 Sep;19(5):347-354. doi: 10.1017/cem.2016.375. Epub 2016 Oct 3.

DOI:10.1017/cem.2016.375
PMID:27692013
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The emergency department (ED) left-without-being-seen (LWBS) rate is a performance indicator, although there is limited knowledge about why people leave, or whether they seek alternate care. We studied characteristics of ED LWBS patients to determine factors associated with LWBS.

METHODS

We collected demographic data on LWBS patients at two urban hospitals. Sequential LWBS patients were contacted and surveyed using a standardized telephone survey. A matched group of patients who did not leave were also surveyed. Data were analysed using the Fisher exact test, chi-square test, and student t-test.

RESULTS

The LWBS group (n=1508) and control group (n=1504) were matched for sex, triage category, recorded wait times, employment and education, and having a family physician. LWBS patients were younger, more likely to present in the evening or at night, and lived closer to the hospital. A long wait time was the most cited reason for leaving (79%); concern about medical condition was the most common reason for staying (96%). Top responses for improved likelihood of waiting were shorter wait times (LWBS, 66%; control, 31%) and more information on wait times (41%; 23%). A majority in both groups felt that their condition was a true emergency (63%; 72%). LWBS patients were more likely to seek further health care (63% v. 28%; p<0.001) and sooner (median time 1 day v. 2-4 days; p=0.002). Among patients who felt that their condition was not a true emergency, the top reason for ED attendance was the inability to see their family doctor (62% in both groups).

CONCLUSION

LWBS patients had similar opinions, experiences, and expectations as control patients. The main reason for LWBS was waiting longer than expected. LWBS patients were more likely to seek further health care, and did so sooner. Patients wait because of concern about their health problem. Shorter wait times and improved communication may reduce the LWBS rate.

摘要

目的

急诊科未就诊即离开(LWBS)率是一项绩效指标,不过对于人们离开的原因,或者他们是否寻求其他医疗服务,我们了解得还很有限。我们研究了急诊科LWBS患者的特征,以确定与LWBS相关的因素。

方法

我们收集了两家城市医院LWBS患者的人口统计学数据。通过标准化电话调查对连续的LWBS患者进行联系和调查。还对一组未离开的匹配患者进行了调查。数据采用Fisher精确检验、卡方检验和学生t检验进行分析。

结果

LWBS组(n = 1508)和对照组(n = 1504)在性别、分诊类别、记录的等待时间、就业和教育情况以及是否有家庭医生方面进行了匹配。LWBS患者更年轻,更有可能在晚上或夜间就诊,并且住得离医院更近。等待时间过长是最常被提及的离开原因(79%);对病情的担忧是最常见的留下原因(96%)。对于提高等待可能性的首要反馈是等待时间缩短(LWBS组为66%;对照组为31%)以及关于等待时间的更多信息(41%;23%)。两组中的大多数人都认为自己的病情是真正的紧急情况(63%;72%)。LWBS患者更有可能寻求进一步的医疗服务(63%对28%;p<0.001),并且寻求的时间更早(中位时间为1天对2 - 4天;p = 0.002)。在那些认为自己的病情不是真正紧急情况的患者中,前往急诊科就诊的首要原因是无法看自己的家庭医生(两组均为62%)。

结论

LWBS患者与对照患者有相似的意见、经历和期望。LWBS的主要原因是等待时间比预期长。LWBS患者更有可能寻求进一步的医疗服务,并且寻求的时间更早。患者因为对自身健康问题的担忧而等待。缩短等待时间和改善沟通可能会降低LWBS率。

相似文献

1
A comparative study of patient characteristics, opinions, and outcomes, for patients who leave the emergency department before medical assessment.对在医疗评估前离开急诊科的患者的特征、意见和结果进行的一项比较研究。
CJEM. 2017 Sep;19(5):347-354. doi: 10.1017/cem.2016.375. Epub 2016 Oct 3.
2
Review article: leaving the emergency department without being seen.综述文章:未就诊即离开急诊科
Emerg Med Australas. 2008 Aug;20(4):306-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-6723.2008.01103.x.
3
Patients who leave the emergency department without being seen.未经诊治就离开急诊科的患者。
J Emerg Nurs. 2009 Apr;35(2):105-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jen.2008.05.006. Epub 2008 Aug 27.
4
Characteristics of patients who leave emergency departments without being seen.未经诊治即离开急诊科的患者特征。
Acad Emerg Med. 2006 Aug;13(8):848-52. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2006.01.028. Epub 2006 May 2.
5
Setting wait times to achieve targeted left-without-being-seen rates.设置等待时间以实现目标的无需等待就诊率。
Am J Emerg Med. 2014 Apr;32(4):342-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2013.12.047. Epub 2014 Jan 3.
6
Patient expectations of emergency department care: phase II--a cross-sectional survey.患者对急诊科护理的期望:第二阶段——横断面调查。
CJEM. 2006 May;8(3):148-57. doi: 10.1017/s1481803500013658.
7
Patients who leave Emergency Department without being seen or during treatment in the Lazio Region (Central Italy): Determinants and short term outcomes.在拉齐奥地区(意大利中部),未被诊治或在治疗过程中离开急诊部的患者:决定因素和短期结局。
PLoS One. 2018 Dec 12;13(12):e0208914. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208914. eCollection 2018.
8
A 5-year time study analysis of emergency department patient care efficiency.急诊科患者护理效率的5年时间研究分析。
Ann Emerg Med. 1999 Sep;34(3):326-35. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(99)70126-5.
9
The effect of crowding on access and quality in an academic ED.拥挤对学术性急诊科就诊机会和医疗质量的影响。
Am J Emerg Med. 2006 Nov;24(7):787-94. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2006.03.026.
10
An emergency department patient flow model based on queueing theory principles.基于排队论原理的急诊科患者流量模型。
Acad Emerg Med. 2013 Sep;20(9):939-46. doi: 10.1111/acem.12215.

引用本文的文献

1
Community Knowledge and Attitude Towards the Emergency Triage System at a Tertiary Hospital in Oman.阿曼一家三级医院中社区对急诊分诊系统的认知与态度
Oman Med J. 2024 Sep 30;39(5):e672. doi: 10.5001/omj.2024.102. eCollection 2024 Sep.
2
Factors Associated With Leaving-Without-Being-Seen in Pediatric Emergency Department Patients.儿科急诊科患者未候诊即离开的相关因素
Cureus. 2024 Dec 7;16(12):e75277. doi: 10.7759/cureus.75277. eCollection 2024 Dec.
3
Turbulence in the system: Higher rates of left-without-being-seen emergency department visits and associations with increased risks of adverse patient outcomes since 2020.
系统中的混乱状况:自2020年以来,急诊室未就诊即离开的比例更高,且与患者不良结局风险增加相关。
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2024 Dec 18;5(6):e13299. doi: 10.1002/emp2.13299. eCollection 2024 Dec.
4
Characteristics of patients leaving the emergency department without being seen by a doctor: The first report from Türkiye.未接受医生诊治即离开急诊部的患者特征:来自土耳其的首次报告。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Nov 15;103(46):e40543. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000040543.
5
Leaving emergency departments without completing treatment among First Nations and non-First Nations patients in Alberta: a mixed-methods study.在艾伯塔省,第一民族和非第一民族患者在离开急诊部门时未完成治疗:一项混合方法研究。
CMAJ. 2024 Apr 21;196(15):E510-E523. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.231019.
6
The effect of having a physician in the triage area on the rate of patients leaving without being seen: A quality improvement initiative at King Fahad Specialist hospital.分诊区配备医生对患者未就诊即离院率的影响:法赫德国王专科医院的一项质量改进举措。
Saudi Med J. 2024 Jan;45(1):74-78. doi: 10.15537/smj.2024.45.1.20230674.
7
Refusal of the hospitalization: a distressed dilemma in obstetric practice.拒绝住院:产科实践中的一个棘手困境。
Ther Adv Reprod Health. 2023 Dec 25;17:26334941231216531. doi: 10.1177/26334941231216531. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
8
Emergency department performance assessment using administrative data: A managerial framework.利用行政数据评估急诊科绩效:管理框架。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 2;18(11):e0293401. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293401. eCollection 2023.
9
Waiting Time and Patient Satisfaction in a Subspecialty Eye Hospital Using a Mobile Data Collection Kit: Pre-Post Quality Improvement Intervention.使用移动数据收集工具的眼科专科医院的等待时间与患者满意度:质量改进干预前后对比
JMIRx Med. 2022 Aug 9;3(3):e34263. doi: 10.2196/34263.
10
'I knew I'd be taken care of': Exploring patient experiences in the Emergency Department.“我知道我会得到照顾的”:探索急诊科的患者体验。
J Adv Nurs. 2022 Oct;78(10):3330-3344. doi: 10.1111/jan.15317. Epub 2022 Jun 19.