Suppr超能文献

经过12周的训练后,功能性动作筛查(Functional Movement Screen™)能否用于捕捉脊柱和膝关节运动控制的变化?

Can the Functional Movement Screen™ be used to capture changes in spine and knee motion control following 12 weeks of training?

作者信息

Frost David M, Beach Tyson A C, Campbell Troy L, Callaghan Jack P, McGill Stuart M

机构信息

Faculty of Kinesiology and Physical Education, University of Toronto, 55 Harbord Street, Toronto, Ontario M5S 2W6, Canada.

Department of Kinesiology, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, Ontario N2L 3G1, Canada.

出版信息

Phys Ther Sport. 2017 Jan;23:50-57. doi: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2016.06.003. Epub 2016 Jun 7.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine whether objective measures of spine and frontal plane knee motion exhibited during Functional Movement Screen™ (FMS) task performance changed following a movement-guided fitness (MOV) and conventional fitness (FIT) exercise intervention.

DESIGN

Secondary analysis of a randomized controlled experiment. Before and after 12 weeks of exercise, participants' kinematics were quantified while performing the FMS and a series of general whole-body movement tasks.

SETTING

Biomechanics laboratory.

PARTICIPANTS

Fifty-two firefighters were assigned to MOV, FIT, or a control (CON) group.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Peak lumbar spine flexion/extension, lateral bend and axial twist, and frontal plane knee motion.

RESULTS

The post-training kinematic changes exhibited by trainees while performing the FMS tasks were similar in magnitude (effect size < 0.8) to those exhibited by CON. However, when performing the battery of general whole-body movement tasks, only MOV showed significant improvements in spine and frontal plane knee motion control (effect size > 0.5).

CONCLUSIONS

Whether graded qualitatively, or quantitatively via kinematic analyses, the FMS may not be a viable tool to detect movement-based exercise adaptations. Amendments to the FMS tasks and/or scoring method are needed before it can be used for reasons beyond appraising the ability to move freely, symmetrically, and without pain.

摘要

目的

研究在功能性动作筛查(FMS)任务执行过程中所展现的脊柱和额状面膝关节运动的客观测量指标,在运动引导健身(MOV)和传统健身(FIT)运动干预后是否发生变化。

设计

一项随机对照实验的二次分析。在为期12周的运动前后,对参与者在执行FMS和一系列一般全身运动任务时的运动学进行量化。

地点

生物力学实验室。

参与者

52名消防员被分配到MOV组、FIT组或对照组(CON)。

观察指标

腰椎最大屈伸、侧弯和轴向扭转,以及额状面膝关节运动。

结果

训练后,学员在执行FMS任务时所展现的运动学变化幅度(效应量<0.8)与对照组相似。然而,在执行一系列一般全身运动任务时,只有MOV组在脊柱和额状面膝关节运动控制方面有显著改善(效应量>0.5)。

结论

无论通过定性分级还是通过运动学分析进行定量评估,FMS可能都不是检测基于运动的锻炼适应性的可行工具。在FMS可用于评估除自由、对称且无痛运动能力之外的其他原因之前,需要对FMS任务和/或评分方法进行修正。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验