Melbourne School of Government, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2016 Jul 1;5(7):439-442. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2016.49.
Many public policy programs fail to translate ambitious headlines to on-the-ground action. The reasons for this are many and varied, but for public administration and management scholars a large part of the gap between ambition and achievement is the challenge associated with the operation of the machinery of government itself, and how it relates to the other parties that it relies on to fulfill these outcomes. In their article, Carey and Friel set out key reasons why public health scholars should seek to better understand important ideas in public administration. In commenting on their contribution, I draw out two critical questions that are raised by this discussion: (i) what are boundaries and what forms do they take? and (ii) why work across boundaries? Expanding on these key questions extends the points made by Carey and Friel on the importance of understanding public administration and will better place public health scholars and practitioners to realise health outcomes.
许多公共政策计划未能将雄心勃勃的头条新闻转化为实际行动。造成这种情况的原因有很多,但对于公共行政和管理学者来说,雄心壮志与成就之间的差距很大一部分是与政府自身运作相关的挑战,以及它与其他依赖于实现这些成果的相关方之间的关系。在他们的文章中,凯里和弗里尔阐述了公共卫生学者应该寻求更好地理解公共行政中重要理念的关键原因。在评论他们的贡献时,我提出了由这一讨论引发的两个关键问题:(i)边界是什么,它们采取什么形式?以及(ii)为什么要跨越边界?扩展这些关键问题将进一步阐述凯里和弗里尔关于理解公共行政重要性的观点,并使公共卫生学者和从业者更好地实现健康成果。