Peterson Kathryn, Bjorkman David J
Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Charles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, Florida, USA.
Am J Gastroenterol. 2016 Oct;111(10):1399-1401. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2016.350.
During their lifetime, about 10% of the population will develop a peptic ulcer. Despite major advancements in the approach to peptic ulcer bleeding over the last 10-20 years including newer endoscopic hemostatic techniques and the advent of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), upper gastrointestinal bleeding due to peptic ulcers results in substantial morbidity, mortality, and cost. Both oral and intravenous PPIs have proven to be effective in preventing recurrent bleeding from peptic ulcers. However, the dosing and administration of PPIs have been a source of ongoing debate, specifically in relation to cost. In this issue of the Journal, Lu et al. perform cost analysis demonstrating that costs from bleeding peptic ulcers are influenced more by efficient triage and discharge of patients than the nuances of variations in administration of intravenous PPI's.
在一生中,约10%的人口会患上消化性溃疡。尽管在过去10至20年里,消化性溃疡出血的治疗方法取得了重大进展,包括更新的内镜止血技术以及质子泵抑制剂(PPI)的出现,但消化性溃疡导致的上消化道出血仍会造成相当高的发病率、死亡率和成本。口服和静脉注射PPI均已被证明在预防消化性溃疡再次出血方面有效。然而,PPI的给药剂量和方式一直是持续争论的焦点,特别是在成本方面。在本期杂志中,Lu等人进行了成本分析,结果表明,消化性溃疡出血的成本受患者有效分诊和出院的影响更大,而非静脉注射PPI给药方式细微差异的影响。