Alramadhan Mansoor, Ryu Jai Min, Rayzah Musaed, Nam Seok Jin, Kim Seok Won, Yu Jonghan, Lee Se Kyung, Bae Soo Youn, Park Sungmin, Paik Hyun-June, Lee Jeong Eon
Division of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Division of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Breast. 2016 Dec;30:111-117. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2016.08.011. Epub 2016 Sep 30.
To study the outcomes of adjuvant goserelin combined with tamoxifen (GosTam) compared to chemotherapy followed by tamoxifen (ChemTam) in premenopausal patients with early stage, luminal A breast cancer.
From 2008 until 2013, data were retrospectively collected for premenopausal patients who underwent surgery for invasive tumors that were ≤2.0 cm, node-negative, strongly positive for estrogen and progesterone receptors, HER-2-negative, and Ki-67 < 25%. The patients were divided into two groups according to adjuvant regimen, either GosTam or ChemTam. All patients who underwent different adjuvant regimens were excluded.
In total, 235 patients underwent GosTam and 171 patients underwent ChemTam. There were significantly more patients younger than 40 years in the GosTam group (32% GosTam vs. 22% ChemTam, p = 0.031). Mean tumor size was significantly smaller (1.19 cm vs. 1.48 cm, p < 0.001), Ki-67 significantly lower (p = 0.049), and nuclear grade was low in a significant number of patients in the GosTam group (2% vs. 13%, p < 0.001). After a median follow-up of 51.3 months, there was no mortality in either group. There was no significant difference in 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) between the two groups even after univariate analysis considering age, tumor size, nuclear grade, and P53% (GosTam = 98.9% vs. ChemTam = 95.7%, HR = 0.404, 95% CI = [0.073, 2.222], p = 0.248).
There was no difference between treatment groups, and neither chemotherapy nor ovarian suppression seemed to improve the outcome. Thus, tamoxifen alone might be a sufficient option for this low-risk patient population.
研究在绝经前早期腔面A型乳腺癌患者中,与先进行化疗再服用他莫昔芬(化疗-他莫昔芬组)相比,辅助使用戈舍瑞林联合他莫昔芬(戈舍瑞林-他莫昔芬组)的治疗效果。
回顾性收集2008年至2013年期间接受手术治疗的绝经前患者的数据,这些患者的浸润性肿瘤≤2.0 cm,无淋巴结转移,雌激素和孕激素受体强阳性,HER-2阴性,且Ki-67<25%。根据辅助治疗方案,将患者分为戈舍瑞林-他莫昔芬组或化疗-他莫昔芬组。排除所有接受不同辅助治疗方案的患者。
共有235例患者接受戈舍瑞林-他莫昔芬治疗,171例患者接受化疗-他莫昔芬治疗。戈舍瑞林-他莫昔芬组中年龄小于40岁的患者明显更多(戈舍瑞林-他莫昔芬组为32%,化疗-他莫昔芬组为22%,p = 0.031)。戈舍瑞林-他莫昔芬组的平均肿瘤大小明显更小(1.19 cm对1.48 cm,p<0.001),Ki-67明显更低(p = 0.049),且大量患者的核分级较低(2%对13%,p<0.001)。中位随访51.3个月后,两组均无死亡病例。即使在对年龄、肿瘤大小、核分级和P53%进行单因素分析后,两组的5年无病生存率(DFS)也无显著差异(戈舍瑞林-他莫昔芬组为98.9%,化疗-他莫昔芬组为95.7%,HR = 0.404,95%CI = [0.073, 2.222],p = 0.248)。
治疗组之间无差异,化疗和卵巢抑制似乎均未改善治疗效果。因此,对于该低风险患者群体,单独使用他莫昔芬可能是一个足够的选择。