Ray Wayne A, Chung Cecilia P, Murray Katherine T, Hall Kathi, Stein C Michael
Department of Health Policy, Village at Vanderbilt, Ste 2600, 1501 21st Ave S, Nashville, TN 37212.
Department of Health Policy, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
J Clin Psychiatry. 2017 Feb;78(2):190-195. doi: 10.4088/JCP.15m10324.
Studies demonstrating that higher doses of citalopram (> 40 mg) and escitalopram (> 20 mg) prolong the corrected QT interval prompted regulatory agency warnings, which are controversial, given the absence of confirmatory clinical outcome studies. We compared the risk of potential arrhythmia-related deaths for high doses of these selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) to that for equivalent doses of fluoxetine, paroxetine, and sertraline.
The Tennessee Medicaid retrospective cohort study included 54,220 persons 30-74 years of age without cancer or other life-threatening illness who were prescribed high-dose SSRIs from 1998 through 2011. The mean age was 47 years, and 76% were female. Demographic characteristics and comorbidity for individual SSRIs were comparable. Because arrhythmia-related deaths are typically sudden and occur outside the hospital, we analyzed out-of-hospital sudden unexpected death as well as sudden cardiac deaths, a more specific indicator of proarrhythmic effects.
The adjusted risk of sudden unexpected death for citalopram did not differ significantly from that for the other SSRIs. The respective hazard ratios (HRs) for citalopram versus escitalopram, fluoxetine, paroxetine, and sertraline were 0.84 (95% CI, 0.40-1.75), 1.24 (95% CI, 0.75-2.05), 0.75 (95% CI, 0.45-1.24), and 1.53 (95% CI, 0.91-2.55). There were no significant differences for sudden cardiac death or all study deaths, nor were there significant differences among high-risk patients (≥ 60 years of age, upper quartile baseline cardiovascular risk). Escitalopram users had no significantly increased risk for any study end point.
We found no evidence that risk of sudden unexpected death, sudden cardiac death, or total mortality for high-dose citalopram and escitalopram differed significantly from that for comparable doses of fluoxetine, paroxetine, and sertraline.
有研究表明,较高剂量的西酞普兰(>40毫克)和艾司西酞普兰(>20毫克)会延长校正QT间期,这引发了监管机构的警告,但鉴于缺乏确证性临床结局研究,这些警告存在争议。我们比较了高剂量的这些选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRI)与同等剂量的氟西汀、帕罗西汀和舍曲林导致潜在心律失常相关死亡的风险。
田纳西医疗补助回顾性队列研究纳入了54220名年龄在30至74岁之间、无癌症或其他危及生命疾病的患者,这些患者在1998年至2011年期间被开具了高剂量SSRI处方。平均年龄为47岁,76%为女性。各SSRI的人口统计学特征和合并症具有可比性。由于心律失常相关死亡通常是突然发生且在院外,我们分析了院外意外猝死以及心源性猝死,后者是致心律失常作用的一个更具体指标。
西酞普兰导致意外猝死的校正风险与其他SSRI相比无显著差异。西酞普兰与艾司西酞普兰、氟西汀、帕罗西汀和舍曲林相比,各自的风险比(HR)分别为0.84(95%CI,0.40 - 1.75)、1.24(95%CI,0.75 - 2.05)、0.75(95%CI,0.45 - 1.24)和1.53(95%CI,0.91 - 2.55)。心源性猝死或所有研究死亡情况均无显著差异,高危患者(≥60岁,心血管风险基线处于上四分位数)之间也无显著差异。艾司西酞普兰使用者在任何研究终点的风险均未显著增加。
我们没有发现证据表明高剂量西酞普兰和艾司西酞普兰导致意外猝死、心源性猝死或总死亡率的风险与同等剂量的氟西汀、帕罗西汀和舍曲林有显著差异。