Significance of Size of Persistent/Recurrent Central Nodal Disease on Surgical Morbidity and Response to Therapy in Reoperative Neck Dissection for Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND

To balance the risk of disease progression, morbidity, and efficacy of reoperative central neck dissection (RCND) in papillary thyroid carcinoma, the latest clinical guidelines recommend early surgery over surveillance when the largest diseased node is >8 mm in its smallest dimension. However, the evidence remains scarce. To determine an appropriate size for first-time RCND, the relationship between size of largest diseased central node, morbidity, and response-to-therapy following RCND was examined.

METHODS

A total of 130 patients who underwent RCND following initial surgery for persistent/recurrent nodal disease were reviewed. Patients with largest diseased central node measured preoperatively by ultrasonography were included. Eligible patients were categorized into three groups: largest central node <10 mm (group I), 10-15 mm (group II), and >15 mm (group III). Surgical morbidity and response to therapy at one year after RCND were compared between groups. To evaluate biochemical response, patients with structural incompleteness were excluded.

RESULTS

Group III not only had significantly more high-risk tumors (by American Thyroid Association risk stratification) at initial therapy (64.5% vs. 44.4%, respectively; p = 0.038), but this group also a higher risk of extranodal extension (35.5% vs. 16.0%; p = 0.055), recurrent laryngeal nerve involvement (19.4% vs. 0.0%; p < 0.001), incomplete surgical resection (48.4% vs. 7.4%; p < 0.001), new-onset vocal cord paresis (16.7% vs. 2.5%; p = 0.017), overall surgical morbidity (22.6% vs. 7.4%; p = 0.021), and biochemical incompleteness (80.6% vs. 67.9%; p = 0.004) than groups I and II combined did. However, overall morbidity did not differ between groups I and II (5.7% vs. 8.7%; p = 0.694). After adjusting for American Thyroid Association risk stratification, only the size of the largest diseased central node ≥15 mm (odds ratio = 7.256 [confidence interval 1.302-40.434], p = 0.001) was an independent risk factor for biochemical incompleteness following RCND.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with larger diseased central node(s) had a significantly higher risk of local invasion, surgical morbidity, and biochemical incompleteness. Relative to nodal size <10 mm, size >15 mm in the largest disease central node was an independent risk factor for incomplete biochemical response, while nodal size 10-15 mm was not. These findings imply that the recommended threshold of 8 mm might be too stringent and could be raised to 15 mm without increasing the surgical morbidity from RCND.