Paternina-Caicedo Angel, Miranda Jezid, Bourjeily Ghada, Levinson Andrew, Dueñas Carmelo, Bello-Muñoz Camilo, Rojas-Suarez José A
Grupo de Investigación en Cuidados intensivos y Obstetricia (GRICIO), Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Universidad de Cartagena, Barrio Alcibia, sector María Auxiliadora, Cartagena, Colombia.
Grupo de Investigación en Cuidados intensivos y Obstetricia (GRICIO), Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Universidad de Cartagena, Barrio Alcibia, sector María Auxiliadora, Cartagena, Colombia.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jan;216(1):58.e1-58.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.09.103. Epub 2016 Oct 15.
Every day, about 830 women die worldwide from preventable causes related to pregnancy and childbirth. Obstetric early warning scores have been proposed as a potential tool to reduce maternal morbidity and mortality, based on the identification of predetermined abnormal values in the vital signs or laboratory parameters, to generate a rapid and effective medical response. Several early warning scores have been developed for obstetrical patients, but the majority are the result of a clinical consensus rather than statistical analyses of clinical outcome measures (ie, maternal deaths). In 2013, the Intensive Care National Audit and Research Center Case Mix Program reported the first statistically validated early warning scoring system for pregnant women.
We sought to assess the performance of the Intensive Care National Audit and Research Center Obstetric Early Warning Score in predicting death among pregnant women who required admission to the intensive care unit.
This retrospective cohort study included pregnant women admitted to the intensive care unit at a tertiary referral center from January 2006 through December 2011 in Colombia, a developing country, with direct and indirect obstetric-related conditions. The Obstetric Early Warning Score was calculated based on data collected during the first 24 hours of intensive care unit admission. The Obstetric Early Warning Score is calculated based on values of the following variables: systolic and diastolic blood pressure, respiratory rate, heart rate, fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO) required to maintain an oxygen saturation ≥96%, temperature, and level of consciousness. The performance of the Obstetric Early Warning Score was evaluated using the area under the receiver operator characteristic curve. Outcomes selected were: maternal death, need for mechanical ventilation, and/or vasoactive support. Statistical methods included distribution appropriate univariate analyses and multivariate logistic regression.
During the study period, 50,897 births were recorded. There were 724 obstetric admissions to critical care, for an intensive care unit admission rate of 14.22 per 1000 deliveries. A total of 702 women were included in the study, with 29 (4.1%) maternal deaths, and a mortality ratio of 56.98 deaths per 100,000 live births. The most frequent causes of admission were direct, obstetric-related conditions (n = 534; 76.1%). The Obstetric Early Warning Score value was significantly higher in nonsurvivors than in survivors [12 (interquartile range 10-13) vs 7 (interquartile range 4-9); P < .001]. Peripartum women with normal values of Obstetric Early Warning Score had 0% mortality rate, while those with high Obstetric Early Warning Score values (>6) had a mortality rate of 6.3%. The area under the receiver operator characteristic curve of the Obstetric Early Warning Score in discrimination of maternal death was 0.84 (95% confidence interval, 0.75-0.92). The overall predictive value of the Obstetric Early Warning Score was better when the main cause of admission was directly related to pregnancy or the postpartum state. The area under the receiver operator characteristic curve of the score in conditions directly related to pregnancy and postpartum was 0.87 (95% confidence interval, 0.79-0.95), while in indirectly related conditions the area under the receiver operator characteristic curve was 0.77 (95% confidence interval, 0.58-0.96).
Although there are opportunities for improvement, Obstetric Early Warning Score obtained upon admission to the intensive care unit can predict survival in conditions directly related to pregnancy and postpartum. The use of early warning scores in obstetrics may be a highly useful approach in the early identification of women at an increased risk of dying.
全球每天约有830名女性死于与妊娠和分娩相关的可预防原因。产科早期预警评分已被提议作为一种潜在工具,通过识别生命体征或实验室参数中的预定异常值,以快速有效地做出医疗反应,从而降低孕产妇发病率和死亡率。已经为产科患者开发了几种早期预警评分,但大多数是临床共识的结果,而非基于临床结局指标(即孕产妇死亡)的统计分析。2013年,重症监护国家审计与研究中心病例组合项目报告了首个经统计学验证的孕妇早期预警评分系统。
我们试图评估重症监护国家审计与研究中心产科早期预警评分在预测需要入住重症监护病房的孕妇死亡方面的表现。
这项回顾性队列研究纳入了2006年1月至2011年12月期间在哥伦比亚一家三级转诊中心因直接和间接产科相关疾病入住重症监护病房的孕妇。产科早期预警评分是根据重症监护病房入院后最初24小时收集的数据计算得出的。产科早期预警评分基于以下变量的值计算:收缩压和舒张压、呼吸频率、心率、维持氧饱和度≥96%所需的吸入氧分数(FiO)、体温和意识水平。使用受试者操作特征曲线下面积评估产科早期预警评分的表现。选定的结局包括:孕产妇死亡、需要机械通气和/或血管活性支持。统计方法包括分布适当的单变量分析和多变量逻辑回归。
在研究期间,共记录了50897例分娩。有724例产科患者入住重症监护病房,重症监护病房入住率为每1000例分娩14.22例。共有702名女性纳入研究,其中29例(4.1%)孕产妇死亡,死亡率为每10万活产56.98例死亡。最常见的入院原因是直接的产科相关疾病(n = 534;76.1%)。非幸存者的产科早期预警评分值显著高于幸存者[12(四分位间距10 - 13)对7(四分位间距4 - 9);P <.001]。产科早期预警评分值正常的围产期女性死亡率为0%,而评分值高(>6)的女性死亡率为6.3%。产科早期预警评分在区分孕产妇死亡方面的受试者操作特征曲线下面积为0.84(95%置信区间,0.75 - 0.92)。当入院的主要原因与妊娠或产后状态直接相关时,产科早期预警评分的总体预测价值更好。该评分在与妊娠和产后直接相关的情况下,受试者操作特征曲线下面积为0.87(95%置信区间,0.79 - 0.95),而在间接相关情况下,受试者操作特征曲线下面积为0.77(95%置信区间,0.58 - 0.96)。
尽管仍有改进空间,但入住重症监护病房时获得的产科早期预警评分可以预测与妊娠和产后直接相关情况下的生存情况。在产科中使用早期预警评分可能是早期识别死亡风险增加女性的一种非常有用的方法。