Gea-Banacloche Juan, Komanduri Krishna V, Carpenter Paul, Paczesny Sophie, Sarantopoulos Stefanie, Young Jo-Anne, El Kassar Nahed, Le Robert Q, Schultz Kirk R, Griffith Linda M, Savani Bipin N, Wingard John R
Experimental Transplantation and Immunology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.
Sylvester Adult Stem Cell Transplant Program, University of Miami, Coral Gables, Florida.
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2017 Jun;23(6):870-881. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2016.10.001. Epub 2016 Oct 14.
Immune reconstitution after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) beyond 1 year is not completely understood. Many transplant recipients who are free of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and not receiving any immunosuppression more than 1 year after transplantation seem to be able to mount appropriate immune responses to common pathogens and respond adequately to immunizations. However, 2 large registry studies over the last 2 decades seem to indicate that infection is a significant cause of late mortality in some patients, even in the absence of concomitant GVHD. Research on this topic is particularly challenging for several reasons. First, there are not enough long-term follow-up clinics able to measure even basic immune parameters late after HCT. Second, the correlation between laboratory measurements of immune function and infections is not well known. Third, accurate documentation of infectious episodes is notoriously difficult. Finally, it is unclear what measures can be implemented to improve the immune response in a clinically relevant way. A combination of long-term multicenter prospective studies that collect detailed infectious data and store samples as well as a national or multinational registry of clinically significant infections (eg, vaccine-preventable severe infections, opportunistic infections) could begin to address our knowledge gaps. Obtaining samples for laboratory evaluation of the immune system should be both calendar and eventdriven. Attention to detail and standardization of practices regarding prophylaxis, diagnosis, and definitions of infections would be of paramount importance to obtain clean reliable data. Laboratory studies should specifically address the neogenesis, maturation, and exhaustion of the adaptive immune system and, in particular, how these are influenced by persistent alloreactivity, inflammation, and viral infection. Ideally, some of these long-term prospective studies would collect information on long-term changes in the gut microbiome and their influence on immunity. Regarding enhancement of immune function, prospective measurement of the response to vaccines late after HCT in a variety of clinical settings should be undertaken to better understand the benefits as well as the limitations of immunizations. The role of intravenous immunoglobulin is still not well defined, and studies to address it should be encouraged.
造血干细胞移植(HCT)1年后的免疫重建尚未完全明确。许多移植受者在移植1年多后无移植物抗宿主病(GVHD)且未接受任何免疫抑制,似乎能够对常见病原体产生适当的免疫反应,并对免疫接种做出充分反应。然而,过去20年的两项大型登记研究似乎表明,感染是一些患者晚期死亡的重要原因,即使在没有并发GVHD的情况下也是如此。由于几个原因,对该主题的研究特别具有挑战性。首先,没有足够的长期随访诊所能够在HCT晚期测量甚至基本的免疫参数。其次,免疫功能的实验室测量与感染之间的相关性尚不清楚。第三,感染发作的准确记录非常困难。最后,尚不清楚可以采取哪些措施以临床相关的方式改善免疫反应。结合收集详细感染数据并储存样本的长期多中心前瞻性研究以及国家或跨国临床上重要感染(如疫苗可预防的严重感染、机会性感染)登记册,可能会开始填补我们的知识空白。获取用于免疫系统实验室评估的样本应基于时间和事件驱动。在预防、诊断和感染定义方面注重细节和实践标准化对于获得清晰可靠的数据至关重要。实验室研究应特别关注适应性免疫系统的新生、成熟和耗竭,尤其是这些过程如何受到持续的同种异体反应性、炎症和病毒感染的影响。理想情况下,这些长期前瞻性研究中的一些将收集肠道微生物群长期变化及其对免疫影响的信息。关于增强免疫功能,应在各种临床环境中对HCT晚期疫苗反应进行前瞻性测量,以更好地了解免疫接种的益处和局限性。静脉注射免疫球蛋白的作用仍未明确界定,应鼓励开展相关研究。