Zuo Y, Willis R, Papalardo E, Petri M, Harris E N, Schleh A, DeCeulaer K, Smikle M, Vilá L M, Reveille J D, Alarcón G S, Gonzalez E B
1 University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Texas, USA.
2 University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, USA.
Lupus. 2017 May;26(6):606-615. doi: 10.1177/0961203316671812. Epub 2016 Oct 16.
Background While essential for the classification of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), anticardiolipin (aCL) assays lack specificity and anti-β2glycoproteinI (anti-β2GPI) assays lack sensitivity in this regard. Our aim was to perform a comparative analysis of the APhL ELISA assay (IgG/IgM) and criteria antiphospholipid (aPL) immunoassays in identifying APS-related clinical manifestations in a large group of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Methods Serum samples from 1178 patients from the Hopkins ( n = 543), LUMINA ( n = 588) and Jamaican SLE cohorts ( n = 47) were examined for IgG/IgM positivity in aCL (in-house), anti-β2GPI (two commercial kits) and APhL (Louisville APL) ELISA assays. Correlation of assay positivity with clinical manifestations and sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values and likelihood ratios were evaluated. A case series analysis was also performed in patients for whom there was isolated positivity in the specific aPL assays. Results The prevalence of aCL positivity was 34.9%, anti-β2GPI kit A was 22.6%, APhL was 11.5% and anti-β2GPI kit B was 7.6% in the study population. Anti-β2GPI kit B, aCL and APhL assays were correlated with venous thrombosis, while only APhL was significantly correlated with arterial thrombosis and consistently correlated with pregnancy-related morbidity. No significant correlations were noted for anti-β2GPI kit A. Sensitivity was greatest for aCL assays followed by anti-β2GPI kit A, APhL and anti-β2GPI kit B, while specificity was greatest and equal for anti-β2GPI kit B and APhL assays. Conclusions Overall, APhL antibodies, especially IgG, represent a promising biomarker for the classification of APS patients in the context of autoimmunity and in risk assessment with regards to pregnancy morbidity and thrombotic manifestations.
背景 虽然抗心磷脂(aCL)检测对于抗磷脂综合征(APS)的分类至关重要,但在这方面缺乏特异性,而抗β2糖蛋白I(抗β2GPI)检测缺乏敏感性。我们的目的是对APhL ELISA检测(IgG/IgM)和标准抗磷脂(aPL)免疫检测进行比较分析,以确定一大群系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)患者中与APS相关的临床表现。方法 对来自霍普金斯队列(n = 543)、LUMINA队列(n = 588)和牙买加SLE队列(n = 47)的1178例患者的血清样本进行aCL(内部检测)、抗β2GPI(两种商业试剂盒)和APhL(路易斯维尔APL)ELISA检测,以检测IgG/IgM阳性情况。评估检测阳性与临床表现的相关性以及敏感性、特异性、阳性和阴性预测值及似然比。还对特定aPL检测中单独呈阳性的患者进行了病例系列分析。结果 在研究人群中,aCL阳性率为34.9%,抗β2GPI试剂盒A为22.6%,APhL为11.5%,抗β2GPI试剂盒B为7.6%。抗β2GPI试剂盒B、aCL和APhL检测与静脉血栓形成相关,而只有APhL与动脉血栓形成显著相关且与妊娠相关并发症持续相关。抗β2GPI试剂盒A未发现显著相关性。aCL检测的敏感性最高,其次是抗β2GPI试剂盒A、APhL和抗β2GPI试剂盒B,而抗β2GPI试剂盒B和APhL检测的特异性最高且相等。结论 总体而言,APhL抗体,尤其是IgG,是在自身免疫背景下对APS患者进行分类以及在妊娠并发症和血栓形成表现的风险评估中很有前景的生物标志物。