Suppr超能文献

监管论坛

Regulatory Forum.

作者信息

Peden W Michael

机构信息

1 Bristol Myers Squibb Co., Mt. Vernon, IN, USA.

出版信息

Toxicol Pathol. 2016 Dec;44(8):1069-1071. doi: 10.1177/0192623316673201. Epub 2016 Oct 17.

Abstract

Revision of the International Council for Harmonization (ICH) S1 guidance for rat carcinogenicity studies to be more selective of compounds requiring a 2-year rat carcinogenicity study has been proposed following extensive evaluation of rat carcinogenicity and chronic toxicity studies by industry and drug regulatory authorities. To inform the ICH S1 expert working group in their potential revision of ICH S1, a prospective evaluation study was initiated in 2013, in which sponsors would assess the pharmacologic and toxicologic findings present in the chronic toxicity studies and predict a positive or negative carcinogenicity outcome using a weight of evidence argument (a carcinogenicity assessment document [CAD]). The Scientific and Regulatory Policy Committee was asked by the Society of Toxicology Pathology (STP) executive committee to track these changes with ICH S1 and inform the STP membership of status changes. This commentary is intended to provide a brief summary of recent changes to the CAD guidance and highlight the importance of STP membership participation in the process of CAD submissions.

摘要

在制药行业和药品监管机构对大鼠致癌性和慢性毒性研究进行广泛评估之后,有人提议修订国际协调理事会(ICH)的S1指导原则,即关于大鼠致癌性研究的指导原则,以便更有针对性地选择那些需要进行两年期大鼠致癌性研究的化合物。为了在ICH S1的潜在修订过程中为ICH S1专家工作组提供参考,2013年启动了一项前瞻性评估研究,在该研究中,申办者将评估慢性毒性研究中存在的药理学和毒理学发现,并使用证据权重论证(致癌性评估文件[CAD])预测致癌性结果为阳性或阴性。毒理病理学会(STP)执行委员会要求科学与监管政策委员会跟踪ICH S1的这些变化,并向STP成员通报状态变化。本评论旨在简要总结CAD指导原则的近期变化,并强调STP成员参与CAD提交过程的重要性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验