Huhn Gregory D, Tebas Pablo, Gallant Joel, Wilkin Timothy, Cheng Andrew, Yan Mingjin, Zhong Lijie, Callebaut Christian, Custodio Joseph M, Fordyce Marshall W, Das Moupali, McCallister Scott
*The Ruth M. Rothstein CORE Center, Chicago, IL; †Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; ‡Southwest CARE Center, Santa Fe, NM; §Division of Infectious Diseases, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY; and ‖Gilead Sciences, Inc., Foster City, CA.
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2017 Feb 1;74(2):193-200. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000001193.
HIV-infected, treatment-experienced adults with a history of prior resistance and regimen failure can be virologically suppressed but may require multitablet regimens associated with lower adherence and potential resistance development.
We enrolled HIV-infected, virologically suppressed adults with 2-class to 3-class drug resistance and at least 2 prior regimen failures into this phase 3, open-label, randomized study. The primary endpoint was the percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA <50 copies per milliliter at week 24 [Food and Drug Administration (FDA) snapshot algorithm].
For 135 participants [elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (E/C/F/TAF) plus darunavir (DRV), n = 89; baseline regimen, n = 46], most of whom were taking a median of 5 tablets/d, simplification to E/C/F/TAF plus DRV was noninferior to continuation of baseline regimens at week 24 (plasma HIV-1 RNA <50 copies per milliliter: 96.6% vs. 91.3%, difference 5.3%, 95.001% CI: -3.4% to 17.4%). E/C/F/TAF plus DRV met prespecified criteria for noninferiority and superiority at week 48 for the same outcome. E/C/F/TAF plus DRV was well tolerated and had an improved renal safety profile compared with baseline regimens, with statistically significant differences between groups in quantitative total proteinuria and markers of proximal tubular proteinuria. Compared with baseline regimens, participants who switched to E/C/F/TAF plus DRV reported higher mean treatment satisfaction scale total scores and fewer days with missed doses.
This study demonstrated that regimen simplification from a 5-tablet regimen to the 2-tablet, once-daily combination of E/C/F/TAF plus DRV has durable maintenance of virologic suppression and improvements in specific markers of renal safety. Such a strategy may lead to greater adherence and improved quality of life.
有过耐药史和治疗方案失败史的接受过治疗的HIV感染成人患者可以实现病毒学抑制,但可能需要多片药物方案,而这与较低的依从性和潜在的耐药性产生相关。
我们将患有2类至3类耐药且至少有2次既往治疗方案失败的HIV感染、病毒学抑制的成人纳入了这项3期、开放标签、随机研究。主要终点是在第24周时HIV-1 RNA<每毫升50拷贝的参与者百分比[美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)快照算法]。
对于135名参与者[艾维雷韦/考比司他/恩曲他滨/替诺福韦艾拉酚胺(E/C/F/TAF)加达拉韦林(DRV),n = 89;基线治疗方案,n = 46],其中大多数人每天服用中位数为5片药物,简化为E/C/F/TAF加DRV在第24周时不劣于继续使用基线治疗方案(血浆HIV-1 RNA<每毫升50拷贝:96.6%对91.3%,差异5.3%,95.001%CI:-3.4%至17.4%)。对于相同结局,E/C/F/TAF加DRV在第48周时达到了预设的非劣效性和优效性标准。E/C/F/TAF加DRV耐受性良好,与基线治疗方案相比,肾脏安全性有所改善,两组在定量总蛋白尿和近端肾小管蛋白尿标志物方面存在统计学显著差异。与基线治疗方案相比,改用E/C/F/TAF加DRV的参与者报告的平均治疗满意度量表总分更高,漏服药物的天数更少。
本研究表明,从每日服用5片药物的方案简化为每日1次服用2片的E/C/F/TAF加DRV联合方案可持久维持病毒学抑制,并改善肾脏安全性的特定标志物。这样的策略可能会带来更高的依从性和生活质量的改善。