1Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, PA. 2Albany Medical Center, Albany, NY. 3University of Arizona College of Pharmacy, Tucson, AZ. 4Clinic Medical Center, Burlington, MA. 5Indiana University, Indiana, IN. 6Grand Strand Medical Center, Myrtle Beach, SC. 7Baystate Medical Center, Springfield, MA. 8Saint Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston, MA. 9University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. 10Riverside Medical Group, Yorktown, VA. 11University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE. 12Novant Health, Clemmons, NC. 13Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA. 14Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN. 15Lancaster General Hospital, Lancaster, PA. 16McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. 17Medscape, New York, NY. 18University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Crit Care Med. 2016 Nov;44(11):2079-2103. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002027.
To update the 2002 version of "Clinical practice guidelines for sustained neuromuscular blockade in the adult critically ill patient."
A Task Force comprising 17 members of the Society of Critical Medicine with particular expertise in the use of neuromuscular-blocking agents; a Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation expert; and a medical writer met via teleconference and three face-to-face meetings and communicated via e-mail to examine the evidence and develop these practice guidelines. Annually, all members completed conflict of interest statements; no conflicts were identified. This activity was funded by the Society for Critical Care Medicine, and no industry support was provided.
Using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system, the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation expert on the Task Force created profiles for the evidence related to six of the 21 questions and assigned quality-of-evidence scores to these and the additional 15 questions for which insufficient evidence was available to create a profile. Task Force members reviewed this material and all available evidence and provided recommendations, suggestions, or good practice statements for these 21 questions.
The Task Force developed a single strong recommendation: we recommend scheduled eye care that includes lubricating drops or gel and eyelid closure for patients receiving continuous infusions of neuromuscular-blocking agents. The Task Force developed 10 weak recommendations. 1) We suggest that a neuromuscular-blocking agent be administered by continuous intravenous infusion early in the course of acute respiratory distress syndrome for patients with a PaO2/FIO2 less than 150. 2) We suggest against the routine administration of an neuromuscular-blocking agents to mechanically ventilated patients with status asthmaticus. 3) We suggest a trial of a neuromuscular-blocking agents in life-threatening situations associated with profound hypoxemia, respiratory acidosis, or hemodynamic compromise. 4) We suggest that neuromuscular-blocking agents may be used to manage overt shivering in therapeutic hypothermia. 5) We suggest that peripheral nerve stimulation with train-of-four monitoring may be a useful tool for monitoring the depth of neuromuscular blockade but only if it is incorporated into a more inclusive assessment of the patient that includes clinical assessment. 6) We suggest against the use of peripheral nerve stimulation with train of four alone for monitoring the depth of neuromuscular blockade in patients receiving continuous infusion of neuromuscular-blocking agents. 7) We suggest that patients receiving a continuous infusion of neuromuscular-blocking agent receive a structured physiotherapy regimen. 8) We suggest that clinicians target a blood glucose level of less than 180 mg/dL in patients receiving neuromuscular-blocking agents. 9) We suggest that clinicians not use actual body weight and instead use a consistent weight (ideal body weight or adjusted body weight) when calculating neuromuscular-blocking agents doses for obese patients. 10) We suggest that neuromuscular-blocking agents be discontinued at the end of life or when life support is withdrawn. In situations in which evidence was lacking or insufficient and the study results were equivocal or optimal clinical practice varies, the Task Force made no recommendations for nine of the topics. 1) We make no recommendation as to whether neuromuscular blockade is beneficial or harmful when used in patients with acute brain injury and raised intracranial pressure. 2) We make no recommendation on the routine use of neuromuscular-blocking agents for patients undergoing therapeutic hypothermia following cardiac arrest. 3) We make no recommendation on the use of peripheral nerve stimulation to monitor degree of block in patients undergoing therapeutic hypothermia. 4) We make no recommendation on the use of neuromuscular blockade to improve the accuracy of intravascular-volume assessment in mechanically ventilated patients. 5) We make no recommendation concerning the use of electroencephalogram-derived parameters as a measure of sedation during continuous administration of neuromuscular-blocking agents. 6) We make no recommendation regarding nutritional requirements specific to patients receiving infusions of neuromuscular-blocking agents. 7) We make no recommendation concerning the use of one measure of consistent weight over another when calculating neuromuscular-blocking agent doses in obese patients. 8) We make no recommendation on the use of neuromuscular-blocking agents in pregnant patients. 9) We make no recommendation on which muscle group should be monitored in patients with myasthenia gravis receiving neuromuscular-blocking agents. Finally, in situations in which evidence was lacking or insufficient but expert consensus was unanimous, the Task Force developed six good practice statements. 1) If peripheral nerve stimulation is used, optimal clinical practice suggests that it should be done in conjunction with assessment of other clinical findings (e.g., triggering of the ventilator and degree of shivering) to assess the degree of neuromuscular blockade in patients undergoing therapeutic hypothermia. 2) Optimal clinical practice suggests that a protocol should include guidance on neuromuscular-blocking agent administration in patients undergoing therapeutic hypothermia. 3) Optimal clinical practice suggests that analgesic and sedative drugs should be used prior to and during neuromuscular blockade, with the goal of achieving deep sedation. 4) Optimal clinical practice suggests that clinicians at the bedside implement measure to attenuate the risk of unintended extubation in patients receiving neuromuscular-blocking agents. 5) Optimal clinical practice suggests that a reduced dose of an neuromuscular-blocking agent be used for patients with myasthenia gravis and that the dose should be based on peripheral nerve stimulation with train-of-four monitoring. 6) Optimal clinical practice suggests that neuromuscular-blocking agents be discontinued prior to the clinical determination of brain death.
更新 2002 年版“成人危重症患者持续神经肌肉阻滞的临床实践指南”。
由 17 名具有神经肌肉阻滞剂使用特别专长的重症医学会成员、一名 Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation 专家以及一名医学作家组成专家组,通过电话会议和三次面对面会议进行检查证据并制定这些实践指南。每年,所有成员都要完成利益冲突声明;没有发现利益冲突。这项活动由重症医学会资助,没有得到行业支持。
专家组制定了一条强烈建议:我们建议对接受连续神经肌肉阻滞剂输注的患者进行定期眼部护理,包括滴眼药水或凝胶和眼睑闭合。专家组制定了 10 条弱建议。1)我们建议对急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者在 PaO2/FIO2 小于 150 时早期给予连续静脉输注神经肌肉阻滞剂。2)我们不建议对哮喘持续状态的机械通气患者常规使用神经肌肉阻滞剂。3)我们建议在与严重低氧血症、呼吸性酸中毒或血流动力学不稳定相关的危及生命的情况下尝试使用神经肌肉阻滞剂。4)我们建议在治疗性低温治疗中,神经肌肉阻滞剂可用于控制明显的寒战。5)我们建议外周神经刺激与四成监测可能是监测神经肌肉阻滞深度的有用工具,但只有当它被纳入对患者的更全面评估时,包括临床评估。6)我们不建议在接受连续输注神经肌肉阻滞剂的患者中单独使用四成监测监测神经肌肉阻滞深度。7)我们建议接受连续输注神经肌肉阻滞剂的患者接受结构化物理治疗方案。8)我们建议接受神经肌肉阻滞剂的患者血糖水平应低于 180mg/dL。9)我们建议临床医生在计算肥胖患者的神经肌肉阻滞剂剂量时,不要使用实际体重,而是使用一致的体重(理想体重或调整体重)。10)我们建议在生命结束或停止生命支持时停止使用神经肌肉阻滞剂。在证据不足或不足且研究结果不确定或最佳临床实践不同的情况下,专家组对九个主题没有提出建议。1)我们不建议在急性脑损伤和颅内压升高的患者中使用神经肌肉阻滞是有益还是有害。2)我们不建议对心脏骤停后接受治疗性低温的患者常规使用神经肌肉阻滞剂。3)我们不建议在接受治疗性低温的患者中使用外周神经刺激监测阻滞程度。4)我们不建议使用神经肌肉阻滞剂来提高机械通气患者血管内容量评估的准确性。5)我们不建议使用脑电图衍生参数作为连续输注神经肌肉阻滞剂期间镇静的衡量标准。6)我们不建议对接受神经肌肉阻滞剂输注的患者提出特定的营养要求。7)我们不建议在计算肥胖患者的神经肌肉阻滞剂剂量时,使用一种衡量体重的方法而不是另一种方法。8)我们不建议在孕妇中使用神经肌肉阻滞剂。9)我们不建议在接受神经肌肉阻滞剂的重症肌无力患者中监测哪个肌肉群。最后,在证据不足或不足但专家共识一致的情况下,专家组制定了六条良好的实践声明。1)如果使用外周神经刺激,最佳临床实践建议应与评估其他临床发现(例如触发呼吸机和寒战程度)结合使用,以评估接受治疗性低温的患者的神经肌肉阻滞程度。2)最佳临床实践建议应包括在接受治疗性低温的患者中使用神经肌肉阻滞剂的方案指导。3)最佳临床实践建议应在使用神经肌肉阻滞剂之前和期间使用镇痛和镇静药物,以达到深度镇静的目的。4)最佳临床实践建议应在床边实施措施,以减轻接受神经肌肉阻滞剂的患者意外拔管的风险。5)最佳临床实践建议对重症肌无力患者使用较低剂量的神经肌肉阻滞剂,且剂量应基于四成监测的外周神经刺激。6)最佳临床实践建议应在临床确定脑死亡之前停止使用神经肌肉阻滞剂。