Augustin J, Austermann J, Erasmi S
Institut für Versorgungsforschung in der Dermatologie und bei Pflegeberufen (IVDP), Universitatsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg.
Hochschule RheinMain, Hochschule RheinMain, Mainz.
Gesundheitswesen. 2019 Jan;81(1):50-57. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-116591. Epub 2016 Oct 18.
One of the overall objectives of the legislator is to ensure an overall "homogeneous", and easily accessible medical care for the population. The physician-patient ratio can be used to describe the regional health care situation. But this method does not provide information concerning the availability of, for instance, the nearest doctor. Therefore, further parameters such as accessibility must be taken into consideration. For this purpose, network analyses are an appropriate method. The objective of this study is to present methodological tools to evaluate the healthcare situation in the metropolitan region of Hamburg, primarily focusing on accessibility using dermatologists as an example.
Analyzing data of 20 counties, the geographical distribution of N=357 dermatologists and the physician-patient ratio were calculated. In a second step, a network analysis regarding accessibility was performed. In order to calculate accessibility, address data (physicians) were transformed into coordinates, consisting of defined places (N=303) and restrictions (e. g. speed, turn restrictions) of the network. The calculation of population-based accessibility is based on grid cells for the population density.
Despite adequacy of the overall medical situation, differences in the availability of the nearest dermatologists in the metropolitan region are remarkable, particularly when use of public transport is taken into consideration. In some counties, over 60% of the population require at least one hour to get to the nearest dermatologist using public transportation. In rural regions within the metropolitan area are particularly affected.
The network analysis has shown that the choice and availability of transportation in combination with the location (rural/urban) is essential for health care access. Especially elderly people in rural areas with restricted mobility are at a disadvantage. Therefore, modern health care approaches (e. g. telemedicine) are necessary to optimize the health care situation in rural areas. Network analyses can make a valuable methodological contribution to the analysis of regional health care disparities.
立法者的总体目标之一是确保为民众提供全面“同质化”且易于获得的医疗服务。医患比例可用于描述地区医疗保健状况。但这种方法无法提供有关例如最近的医生的可及性的信息。因此,必须考虑诸如可及性等进一步的参数。为此,网络分析是一种合适的方法。本研究的目的是提出方法工具,以评估汉堡大都市地区的医疗保健状况,主要以皮肤科医生为例重点关注可及性。
分析20个县的数据后,计算了N = 357名皮肤科医生的地理分布和医患比例。第二步,进行了关于可及性的网络分析。为了计算可及性,将地址数据(医生)转换为坐标,坐标由网络的定义地点(N = 303)和限制条件(例如速度、转弯限制)组成。基于人口的可及性计算是基于人口密度的网格单元。
尽管总体医疗状况充足,但大都市地区最近的皮肤科医生的可及性差异显著,尤其是考虑到公共交通的使用时。在一些县,超过60%的人口乘坐公共交通前往最近的皮肤科医生至少需要一个小时。大都市地区的农村地区受影响尤其严重。
网络分析表明,交通方式的选择和可及性与地点(农村/城市)相结合对于获得医疗保健至关重要。特别是行动不便的农村地区老年人处于不利地位。因此,现代医疗保健方法(例如远程医疗)对于优化农村地区的医疗保健状况是必要的。网络分析可为区域医疗保健差距分析做出有价值的方法贡献。