Chisholm-Burns Marie A, Gatwood Justin, Spivey Christina A, Dickey Susan E
University of Tennessee College of Pharmacy, Memphis, Tennessee.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2016 Sep 25;80(7):117. doi: 10.5688/ajpe807117.
To compare the net cumulative income of community pharmacists, hospital pharmacists, and full-time pharmacy faculty members (residency-trained or with a PhD after obtaining a PharmD) in pharmacy practice, medicinal chemistry, pharmaceutics, pharmacology, and social and administrative sciences. Markov modeling was conducted to calculate net projected cumulative earnings of career paths by estimating the costs of education, including the costs of obtaining degrees and student loans. The economic model spanned 49 years, from ages 18 to 67 years. Earning a PharmD and pursuing an academic career resulted in projected net cumulative lifetime earnings ranging from approximately $4.7 million to $6.3 million. A pharmacy practice faculty position following public pharmacy school and one year of residency resulted in higher net cumulative income than community pharmacy. Faculty members with postgraduate year 1 (PGY1) training also had higher net income than other faculty and hospital pharmacy career paths, given similar years of prepharmacy education and type of pharmacy school attended. Faculty members with either a PharmD or PhD in the pharmacology discipline may net as much as $5.9 million and outpace all other PhD graduates by at least $75 000 in lifetime earnings. Projected career earnings of postgraduate year 2 (PGY2) trained faculty and PharmD/PhD faculty members were lower than those of community pharmacists. Findings were more variable when comparing pharmacy faculty members and hospital pharmacists. With the exception of PGY1 trained academic pharmacists, faculty projected net cumulative incomes generally lagged behind community pharmacists, likely because of delayed entry into the job market as a result of advanced training/education. However, nonsalary benefits such as greater flexibility and autonomy may enhance the desirability of academic pharmacy as a career path.
为比较社区药剂师、医院药剂师以及全职药学教员(接受过住院医师培训或在获得药学博士学位后拥有博士学位)在药学实践、药物化学、药剂学、药理学以及社会与管理科学领域的净累计收入。进行了马尔可夫模型分析,通过估算教育成本,包括获取学位的成本和学生贷款,来计算各职业路径的预计净累计收入。该经济模型涵盖49年,从18岁至67岁。获得药学博士学位并从事学术职业,预计一生的净累计收入约为470万美元至630万美元。公立药学院毕业后担任一年住院医师,再从事药学实践教员职位,其净累计收入高于社区药房。在药学预科教育年限和就读药学院类型相似的情况下,接受过第一年住院医师培训(PGY1)的教员净收入也高于其他教员和医院药房职业路径。药理学专业拥有药学博士或博士学位的教员一生净收入可达590万美元,比所有其他博士毕业生的一生收入至少高出7.5万美元。接受过第二年住院医师培训(PGY2)的教员以及药学博士/博士学位教员的预计职业收入低于社区药剂师。比较药学教员和医院药剂师时,结果的差异更大。除了接受过PGY1培训的学术药剂师外,教员预计的净累计收入通常落后于社区药剂师,这可能是由于进阶培训/教育导致进入就业市场的时间延迟。然而,诸如更大的灵活性和自主权等非薪资福利可能会增加学术药学作为一种职业路径的吸引力。