Suppr超能文献

抗血小板反应测定及药物调整在弹簧圈栓塞中的安全性和有效性:一项倾向评分分析

Safety and efficacy of antiplatelet response assay and drug adjustment in coil embolization: a propensity score analysis.

作者信息

Kim Min Soo, Jo Kyung Il, Yeon Je Young, Kim Jong Soo, Kim Keon Ha, Jeon Pyoung, Hong Seung Chyul

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Ulsan University Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Ulsan, South Korea.

Department of Neurosurgery, Hana General Hospital, Cheongju, South Korea.

出版信息

Neuroradiology. 2016 Nov;58(11):1125-1134. doi: 10.1007/s00234-016-1742-6. Epub 2016 Oct 18.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this study was to explore the safety and efficacy of an antiplatelet response assay and drug adjustment to prevent delayed thromboembolic events after stent-assisted coil embolization.

METHODS

A total of 370 patients were enrolled in this study between December 2005 and July 2014. Of these, 124 patients were placed into the drug resistance test (DRT) group with drug adjustment according to response to an antiplatelet agent, and 246 patients comprised the control group with a standard antiplatelet regimen. The response to the antiplatelet agent was evaluated with the VerifyNow Rapid Platelet Function Assay. Propensity score matching analysis was performed with one-to-multiple matching.

RESULTS

Among 370 patients, delayed thromboembolic events occurred in 28 (7.6 %) patients including 25 (10.2 %) in the control group and three (2.4 %) in the DRT group. Antiplatelet response test (p = 0.012), diabetes mellitus (DM) (p = 0.014), and hypertension (HTN) (p < 0.001) were associated with delayed infarction in multivariate analysis. In propensity score matching analysis, 331 patients were matched (control group (n = 229) vs. DRT group (n = 103)), and antiplatelet response (hazard ratio 0.247, 95 % confidence interval 0.070-0.868, p = 0.029) was correlated with delayed infarction. Conversely, the two groups were not significantly different with regard to total (p = 0.368) or major hemorrhagic complications (p = 0.108).

CONCLUSION

Antiplatelet drug adjustment according to the results of an antiplatelet response assay might be associated with a decreased risk of delayed thromboembolic infarction compared with the standard antiplatelet regimen.

摘要

引言

本研究旨在探讨抗血小板反应检测及药物调整在预防支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞术后迟发性血栓栓塞事件中的安全性和有效性。

方法

2005年12月至2014年7月,共有370例患者纳入本研究。其中,124例患者进入耐药性检测(DRT)组,根据抗血小板药物反应进行药物调整;246例患者组成对照组,采用标准抗血小板方案。使用VerifyNow快速血小板功能检测评估抗血小板药物反应。采用一对一多匹配进行倾向评分匹配分析。

结果

370例患者中,28例(7.6%)发生迟发性血栓栓塞事件,其中对照组25例(10.2%),DRT组3例(2.4%)。多因素分析显示,抗血小板反应检测(p = 0.012)、糖尿病(DM)(p = 0.014)和高血压(HTN)(p < 0.001)与迟发性梗死相关。倾向评分匹配分析中,331例患者进行了匹配(对照组(n = 229) vs. DRT组(n = 103)),抗血小板反应(风险比0.247,95%置信区间0.070 - 0.868,p = 0.029)与迟发性梗死相关。相反,两组在总的(p = 0.368)或主要出血并发症(p = 0.108)方面无显著差异。

结论

与标准抗血小板方案相比,根据抗血小板反应检测结果调整抗血小板药物可能与降低迟发性血栓栓塞性梗死风险相关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验