Brandmeir Nicholas, Nehrbass Elena, McInerney James
Department of Neurosurgery, Penn State Milton S Hershey Medical Center.
Cureus. 2016 Sep 20;8(9):e792. doi: 10.7759/cureus.792.
Deep brain stimulator (DBS) infections are a persistent problem for patients undergoing this procedure. They may require further surgery, treatment with antibiotics, or even removal of the device. To date, no consensus exists on the best practices to avoid DBS infections or what factors predispose patients to an eventual infection. The goal of this study was to examine several patient factors for association with DBS infection.
A single-center, single-surgeon quality improvement database was queried. All patients who experienced an infection were identified. The primary variable analyzed was scalp thickness. Other pre-specified, secondary variables included routine intraoperative cultures, operative time, diagnosis, and age.
None of the independent variables examined were significantly associated with DBS infections. Only two of the 46 infections qualified as surgical site infections as defined by the Centers for Disease Control.
DBS infections are independent of all of the predictor variables analyzed. Surgical site infections, according to traditional definitions, are not the optimal definition for evaluating DBS infections/erosions. New studies must examine new variables that are not routinely gathered in this population. Also, because of the rare event rates and difficulty in randomizing patients to exposures, a large, multicenter registry may be the optimal study design to solve this clinical problem.
对于接受深部脑刺激器(DBS)手术的患者而言,感染是一个长期存在的问题。他们可能需要进一步手术、使用抗生素治疗,甚至移除设备。迄今为止,对于避免DBS感染的最佳做法或哪些因素易使患者最终感染,尚无共识。本研究的目的是探讨与DBS感染相关的几个患者因素。
查询了一个单中心、单外科医生的质量改进数据库。确定了所有发生感染的患者。分析的主要变量是头皮厚度。其他预先指定的次要变量包括常规术中培养、手术时间、诊断和年龄。
所检查的自变量均与DBS感染无显著关联。46例感染中只有2例符合疾病控制中心定义的手术部位感染。
DBS感染与所分析的所有预测变量无关。根据传统定义,手术部位感染并非评估DBS感染/侵蚀的最佳定义。新的研究必须考察该人群中未常规收集的新变量。此外,由于事件发生率低且难以将患者随机分组进行暴露研究,大型多中心登记研究可能是解决这一临床问题的最佳研究设计。