Suppr超能文献

回顾过往,将一氧化氮研究引入实验室。

Reflecting Back to Bring Nitric Oxide Research to the Laboratory.

作者信息

Kumar Rakesh

机构信息

Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ross Hall 530, George Washington University, 2300 Eye Street, N.W., Washington, District of Columbia 20037, USA.

出版信息

Curr Med Chem. 2016;23(24):2637-2642. doi: 10.2174/0929867323666160812150737.

Abstract

Professor Ferid Murad has been a remarkable colleague and a mentor. During our very first meeting, he not only shared unresolved puzzles in Nitric Oxide (NO) research but also listened to my questions pointing to protein nitration and nitrosylation. This was start of a new avenue in my laboratory involving protein nitration, inducible nitric oxide synthase and nitrite production in the context of signaling and gene expression in cancer cells. Dynamic changes in the cytoskeleton remodeling in response to the cell membrane generated signals are regulated by p21-activated kinase 1 (PAK1) which also feed into microtubules (MT) dynamic via phosphorylating Tubulin Cofactor B (CoB) on serine 65 and serine 128. While While searching for the mechanism through which MT biogenesis might be counteracted for the purpose of maintaining the balance in MT dynamic, we explored the possibility of nitration of tyrosine residues in TCoB. We found that TCoB is nitrated on tyrosine 64 and tyrosine 98 and that nitrated TCoB inhibits TCoB phosphorylation and that intact PAK1 phosphorylation sites are also essential for the ability of TCoB to undergo nitration. We suggested a model wherein TCoB nitration acts as a feedback mechanism to counteract PAK1- signaling dependent microtubule dynamics, and thus, revealed an inherent regulatory coordination of growth factor and nitric oxide signaling in microtubule dynamics. In addition, cytoskeleton remodeling and NO production and resulting post-translational modifications in signaling modules serve as important modifiers of cellular processes. Here, I will discuss the cascade of events leading to my first meeting with Professor Murad, the development of scientific interactions, the recognition of our overlapping scientific interests in NO Signaling in cancer cells, and how these interactions have allowed us to connect NO - Cytoskeleton Signaling in cancer cells.

摘要

费里德·穆拉德教授一直是一位杰出的同事和导师。在我们的首次会面中,他不仅分享了一氧化氮(NO)研究中尚未解决的难题,还倾听了我关于蛋白质硝化和亚硝基化的问题。这开启了我实验室一条新的研究途径,涉及癌细胞信号传导和基因表达背景下的蛋白质硝化、诱导型一氧化氮合酶和亚硝酸盐生成。响应细胞膜产生的信号,细胞骨架重塑的动态变化由p21激活激酶1(PAK1)调节,PAK1还通过在丝氨酸65和丝氨酸128上磷酸化微管蛋白辅助因子B(CoB)来影响微管(MT)动态。在探索为维持MT动态平衡而抵消MT生物发生的机制时,我们研究了TCoB中酪氨酸残基硝化的可能性。我们发现TCoB在酪氨酸64和酪氨酸98处被硝化,硝化的TCoB抑制TCoB磷酸化,并且完整的PAK1磷酸化位点对于TCoB进行硝化的能力也至关重要。我们提出了一个模型,其中TCoB硝化作为一种反馈机制来抵消PAK1信号依赖的微管动态,因此揭示了生长因子和一氧化氮信号在微管动态中的内在调节协调。此外,细胞骨架重塑、NO产生以及信号模块中由此产生的翻译后修饰是细胞过程的重要调节因子。在此,我将讨论导致我与穆拉德教授首次会面的一系列事件、科学互动的发展、我们在癌细胞NO信号传导方面重叠科学兴趣的认识,以及这些互动如何使我们将癌细胞中的NO - 细胞骨架信号联系起来。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验