Halladay Jacqueline R, Donahue Katrina E, Cené Crystal W, Li Quefeng, Cummings Doyle M, Hinderliter Alan L, Miller Cassandra L, Garcia Beverly A, Little Edwin, Rachide Margorie, Tillman Jim, Ammerman Alice S, DeWalt Darren
Department of Family Medicine, UNC Chapel Hill, USA; Cecil R. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, Chapel Hill, USA.
Department of Family Medicine, UNC Chapel Hill, USA; Cecil R. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, Chapel Hill, USA.
Patient Educ Couns. 2017 Mar;100(3):542-549. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.10.015. Epub 2016 Oct 20.
Lower health literacy is associated with poorer health outcomes. Few interventions poised to mitigate the impact of health literacy in hypertensive patients have been published. We tested if a multi-level quality improvement intervention could differentially improve Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) more so in patients with low vs. higher health literacy.
We conducted a non-randomized prospective cohort trial of 525 patients referred with uncontrolled hypertension. Stakeholder informed and health literacy sensitive strategies were implemented at the practice and patient level. Outcomes were assessed at 0, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months.
At 12 months, the low and higher health literacy groups had statistically significant decreases in mean SBP (6.6 and 5.3mmHg, respectively), but the between group difference was not significant (Δ 1.3mmHg, P=0.067). At 24 months, the low and higher health literacy groups reductions were 8.1 and 4.6mmHg, respectively, again the between group difference was not significant (Δ 3.5mmHg, p=0.25).
CONCLUSIONS/PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: A health literacy sensitive multi-level intervention may equally lower SBP in patients with low and higher health literacy. Practical health literacy appropriate tools and methods can be implemented in primary care settings using a quality improvement approach.
健康素养较低与较差的健康结果相关。针对减轻高血压患者健康素养影响的干预措施鲜有发表。我们测试了一种多层次质量改进干预措施是否能在健康素养较低与较高的患者中对收缩压(SBP)产生不同程度的改善。
我们对525名因高血压控制不佳前来就诊的患者进行了非随机前瞻性队列试验。在医疗机构和患者层面实施了由利益相关者提供信息且对健康素养敏感的策略。在0、6、12、18和24个月时评估结果。
在12个月时,健康素养较低和较高的组平均收缩压均有统计学意义的下降(分别为6.6和5.3mmHg),但组间差异不显著(差值1.3mmHg,P = 0.067)。在24个月时,健康素养较低和较高的组收缩压分别下降了8.1和4.6mmHg,组间差异同样不显著(差值3.5mmHg,p = 0.25)。
结论/实践意义:一种对健康素养敏感的多层次干预措施可能会使健康素养较低和较高的患者的收缩压同样降低。可以采用质量改进方法在初级保健机构中实施适合实际健康素养的工具和方法。