Pugliese Nicola Riccardo, Fabiani Iacopo, La Carrubba Salvatore, Conte Lorenzo, Antonini-Canterin Francesco, Colonna Paolo, Caso Pio, Benedetto Frank, Santini Veronica, Carerj Scipione, Romano Maria Francesca, Citro Rodolfo, Di Bello Vitantonio
Dipartimento di Patologia Medica, Chirurgica, Molecolare e dell'Area Critica, Università di Pisa, Italy.
Dipartimento di Patologia Medica, Chirurgica, Molecolare e dell'Area Critica, Università di Pisa, Italy.
Am J Cardiol. 2017 Jan 1;119(1):71-77. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.09.018. Epub 2016 Sep 29.
Patients with asymptomatic heart failure (HF; stage A and B) are characterized by maladaptive left ventricular (LV) remodeling. Classic 4-group classification of remodeling considers only LV mass index and relative wall thickness as variables. Complex remodeling classification (CRC) includes also LV end-diastolic volume index. Main aim was to assess the prognostic impact of CRC in stage A and B HF. A total of 1,750 asymptomatic subjects underwent echocardiographic examination as a screening evaluation in the presence of cardiovascular risk factors. LV dysfunction, both systolic (ejection fraction) and diastolic (transmitral flow velocity pattern), was evaluated, together with LV remodeling. We considered a composite end point: all-cause death, myocardial infarction, coronary revascularizations, cerebrovascular events, and acute pulmonary edema. CRC was suitable for 1,729 patients (men 53.6%; age 58.3 ± 13 years). Two hundred thirty-eight patients presented systolic dysfunction (ejection fraction <50%) and 483 diastolic dysfunction. According to the CRC, 891 patients were normals or presented with physiologic hypertrophy, 273 concentric remodeling, 47 eccentric remodeling, 350 concentric hypertrophy, 29 mixed hypertrophy, 86 dilated hypertrophy, and 53 eccentric hypertrophy. Age and gender distribution was noticed (p <0.001). After a median follow-up of 21 months, Kaplan-Meier analysis showed different survival distribution (p <0.001) of the CRC patterns. In multivariate Cox regression (adjusted for age, gender, history of stable ischemic heart disease, classic remodeling classification, systolic, and diastolic dysfunction), CRC was independent predictor of primary end point (p = 0.044, hazard ratio 1.101, 95% CI 1.003 to 1.21), confirmed in a logistic regression (p <0.03). In conclusion, CRC could help physicians in prognostic stratification of patients in stage A and B HF.
无症状心力衰竭(HF;A期和B期)患者的特征是适应性不良的左心室(LV)重塑。经典的4组重塑分类仅将左心室质量指数和相对壁厚度视为变量。复杂重塑分类(CRC)还包括左心室舒张末期容积指数。主要目的是评估CRC在A期和B期HF中的预后影响。共有1750名无症状受试者在存在心血管危险因素的情况下接受了超声心动图检查作为筛查评估。评估了左心室功能障碍,包括收缩功能(射血分数)和舒张功能(二尖瓣血流速度模式),以及左心室重塑。我们考虑了一个复合终点:全因死亡、心肌梗死、冠状动脉血运重建、脑血管事件和急性肺水肿。CRC适用于1729名患者(男性占53.6%;年龄58.3±13岁)。238名患者出现收缩功能障碍(射血分数<50%),483名患者出现舒张功能障碍。根据CRC,891名患者为正常或生理性肥厚,273名患者为同心性重塑,47名患者为离心性重塑,350名患者为同心性肥厚,29名患者为混合性肥厚,86名患者为扩张性肥厚,53名患者为离心性肥厚。注意到年龄和性别分布(p<0.001)。在中位随访21个月后,Kaplan-Meier分析显示CRC模式的生存分布不同(p<0.001)。在多变量Cox回归中(校正年龄、性别、稳定型缺血性心脏病史、经典重塑分类、收缩和舒张功能障碍),CRC是主要终点的独立预测因素(p=0.044,风险比1.101,95%CI 1.003至1.21),在逻辑回归中得到证实(p<0.03)。总之,CRC有助于医生对A期和B期HF患者进行预后分层。