Chahla Jorge, Schon Jason M, Olleac Ramiro, Senes Sebastián, Arroquy Damián, Dean Chase S, Clembosky Gabriel, Muratore Alvaro
Department of BioMedical Engineering, Steadman Philippon Research Institute, Vail, Colorado.
Upper Extremity and Hand Surgery Department, Hospital Británico de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
J Wrist Surg. 2016 Nov;5(4):265-272. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1579764. Epub 2016 Mar 9.
Scapholunate advanced collapse and scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse result in high morbidity and pose significant challenges for active patients. Multiple treatment options have been proposed to yield satisfactory results; however, restoration of physiological wrist motion remains an issue. The objective of this study was to compare wrist mobility after four different treatment methods for grade III wrist collapse: (1) no treatment, (2) scaphoidectomy and lunate-capitate arthrodesis, (3) scaphoidectomy, lunate-capitate arthrodesis, and triquetrum-hamate arthrodesis, and (4) scaphoidectomy, lunate-capitate arthrodesis, and triquetrum excision. Four paired ( = 8) fresh-frozen human cadaveric upper limbs were used in this controlled laboratory study. Computed tomography scans were collected at all testing states and measurements were made to evaluate midcarpal joint mobility and alignment. A significant decrease in wrist extension was observed for all treatments. Middle column and two-column arthrodesis demonstrated no significant differences for carpal alignment and mobility. No significant differences were observed for triquetrum-hamate mobility or wrist extension between the partial and two-column arthrodesis. Triquetrum excision significantly improved ulnar deviation. The most important finding of this study was that the one-column arthrodesis has comparable carpal alignment and range of motion to that of bi-column arthrodesis. The results of this study suggest that a stage III advanced wrist collapse can be treated by isolated lunate-capitate arthrodesis with scaphoidectomy. Fusion between the remaining carpal bones may not be necessary because the carpal alignment and range of motion of the remaining joints were not significantly different in the present study.
舟月骨高级塌陷和舟骨不愈合高级塌陷会导致高发病率,并给活跃的患者带来重大挑战。已经提出了多种治疗方案以取得满意的结果;然而,恢复生理性腕关节活动仍然是一个问题。本研究的目的是比较针对III级腕关节塌陷的四种不同治疗方法后的腕关节活动度:(1)不治疗,(2)舟骨切除和月骨-头状骨关节融合术,(3)舟骨切除、月骨-头状骨关节融合术和三角骨-钩骨关节融合术,以及(4)舟骨切除、月骨-头状骨关节融合术和三角骨切除术。在这项对照实验室研究中使用了四对(n = 8)新鲜冷冻的人体尸体上肢。在所有测试状态下收集计算机断层扫描,并进行测量以评估腕中关节的活动度和对线情况。所有治疗均观察到腕关节伸展明显减少。中柱和双柱关节融合术在腕骨对线和活动度方面无显著差异。部分关节融合术和双柱关节融合术在三角骨-钩骨活动度或腕关节伸展方面未观察到显著差异。三角骨切除显著改善了尺偏。本研究最重要的发现是单柱关节融合术与双柱关节融合术在腕骨对线和活动范围方面具有可比性。本研究结果表明,III期腕关节高级塌陷可通过舟骨切除联合孤立的月骨-头状骨关节融合术进行治疗。由于在本研究中剩余关节的腕骨对线和活动范围没有显著差异,因此剩余腕骨之间的融合可能没有必要。