• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2型糖尿病患者 Medina 0,1,0 型左主干分叉病变的最佳血运重建策略

Optimal Revascularization Strategy on Medina 0,1,0 Left Main Bifurcation Lesions in Type 2 Diabetes.

作者信息

Zheng Xuwei, Peng Hongyu, Zhao Donghui, Ma Qin, Fu Kun, Chen Guo, Fan Qian, Liu Jinghua

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Beijing Institute of Heart, Lung and Blood Vessel Diseases, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100029, China.

Soft Matter and Interdisciplinary Research Center, College of Physics, Chongqing University, Chongqing 401331, China.

出版信息

J Diabetes Res. 2016;2016:1702454. doi: 10.1155/2016/1702454. Epub 2016 Sep 29.

DOI:10.1155/2016/1702454
PMID:27777957
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5061990/
Abstract

. Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease. The implications of a diagnosis of DM are as severe as the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. For many patients with complex coronary artery disease, optimal revascularization strategy selection and optimal medical therapy are equally important. In this study, we compared the hemodynamic results of different stenting techniques for Medina 0,1,0 left main bifurcation lesions. . We use idealized left main bifurcation models and computational fluid dynamics analysis to evaluate hemodynamic parameters which are known to affect the risk of restenosis and thrombosis at stented bifurcation. The surface integrals of time-averaged wall shear stress (TAWSS) and oscillatory shear index (OSI) at bifurcation site were quantified. . Crossover stenting without final kissing balloon angioplasty provided the most favorable hemodynamic results (integrated values of TAWSS = 2.96 × 10 N, OSI = 4.75 × 10 m) with bifurcation area subjected to OSI values >0.25, >0.35, and >0.45 calculated as 0.39 mm, 0.06 mm, and 0 mm, respectively. . Crossover stenting only offers hemodynamic advantages over other stenting techniques for Medina 0,1,0 left main bifurcation lesions and large bifurcation angle is associated with unfavorable flow profiles.

摘要

糖尿病(DM)是心血管疾病的主要危险因素。糖尿病诊断的影响与冠状动脉疾病的诊断一样严重。对于许多患有复杂冠状动脉疾病的患者,选择最佳的血运重建策略和最佳的药物治疗同样重要。在本研究中,我们比较了不同支架置入技术治疗Medina 0,1,0型左主干分叉病变的血流动力学结果。我们使用理想化的左主干分叉模型和计算流体动力学分析来评估已知会影响支架置入分叉处再狭窄和血栓形成风险的血流动力学参数。对分叉部位的时间平均壁面切应力(TAWSS)和振荡切变指数(OSI)的表面积分进行了量化。不进行最终球囊对吻扩张的交叉支架置入术提供了最有利的血流动力学结果(TAWSS积分值 = 2.96 × 10 N,OSI = 4.75 × 10 m),分叉区域OSI值>0.25、>0.35和>0.45时对应的面积分别计算为0.39 mm、0.06 mm和0 mm。交叉支架置入术仅在治疗Medina 0,1,0型左主干分叉病变方面比其他支架置入技术具有血流动力学优势,且大分叉角度与不良血流分布相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/48f1/5061990/17ba18c948ef/JDR2016-1702454.004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/48f1/5061990/0e907e222a3a/JDR2016-1702454.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/48f1/5061990/994f22b35bfa/JDR2016-1702454.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/48f1/5061990/29c0ce1961d1/JDR2016-1702454.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/48f1/5061990/17ba18c948ef/JDR2016-1702454.004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/48f1/5061990/0e907e222a3a/JDR2016-1702454.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/48f1/5061990/994f22b35bfa/JDR2016-1702454.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/48f1/5061990/29c0ce1961d1/JDR2016-1702454.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/48f1/5061990/17ba18c948ef/JDR2016-1702454.004.jpg

相似文献

1
Optimal Revascularization Strategy on Medina 0,1,0 Left Main Bifurcation Lesions in Type 2 Diabetes.2型糖尿病患者 Medina 0,1,0 型左主干分叉病变的最佳血运重建策略
J Diabetes Res. 2016;2016:1702454. doi: 10.1155/2016/1702454. Epub 2016 Sep 29.
2
Flow patterns at stented coronary bifurcations: computational fluid dynamics analysis.支架冠状动脉分叉处的血流模式:计算流体动力学分析。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Aug 1;5(4):530-9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.112.968347. Epub 2012 Jul 3.
3
Impact of bifurcation angle and other anatomical characteristics on blood flow - A computational study of non-stented and stented coronary arteries.分叉角度及其他解剖学特征对血流的影响——无支架和有支架冠状动脉的计算研究
J Biomech. 2016 Jun 14;49(9):1570-1582. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.03.038. Epub 2016 Mar 29.
4
Double Kissing Crush Versus Provisional Stenting for Left Main Distal Bifurcation Lesions: DKCRUSH-V Randomized Trial.双对吻挤压术与预扩张支架术治疗左主干远端分叉病变的随机对照研究(DKCRUSH-V 研究)
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Nov 28;70(21):2605-2617. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.09.1066. Epub 2017 Oct 30.
5
Local hemodynamic changes caused by main branch stent implantation and subsequent virtual side branch balloon angioplasty in a representative coronary bifurcation.在一个具有代表性的冠状动脉分叉处,主支支架植入及随后的虚拟边支球囊血管成形术所引起的局部血流动力学变化。
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2010 Aug;109(2):532-40. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00086.2010. Epub 2010 May 27.
6
Optimal Site for Proximal Optimization Technique in Complex Coronary Bifurcation Stenting: A Computational Fluid Dynamics Study.复杂冠状动脉分叉病变支架置入术近端优化技术的最佳部位:计算流体动力学研究。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2020 Jul;21(7):826-832. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2019.12.015. Epub 2019 Dec 11.
7
Impact of bifurcation dual stenting on endothelial shear stress.分叉双支架置入术对内皮剪切应力的影响。
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2015 Sep 15;119(6):627-32. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00082.2015. Epub 2015 Jul 16.
8
Long-Term Outcomes After Stent Implantation for Left Main Coronary Artery (from the Multicenter Assessing Optimal Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Left Main Coronary Artery Stenting Registry).左主干冠状动脉支架植入后的长期预后(来自多中心评估左主干冠状动脉支架置入术最佳经皮冠状动脉介入治疗注册研究)
Am J Cardiol. 2017 Feb 1;119(3):355-364. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.10.033. Epub 2016 Oct 31.
9
Clinical outcome after crush versus culotte stenting of coronary artery bifurcation lesions: the Nordic Stent Technique Study 36-month follow-up results.经皮冠状动脉分叉病变挤压与 Culotte 支架置入术的临床结果:北欧支架技术研究 36 个月随访结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Nov;6(11):1160-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.06.009.
10
Effects of bifurcation-specific and conventional stents on coronary bifurcation flow. An experimental and numerical study.分叉特异性支架和传统支架对冠状动脉分叉血流的影响:一项实验与数值研究
J Biomech. 2017 Mar 21;54:64-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2017.01.043. Epub 2017 Feb 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparing cross-over stenting and focal ostial stenting for ostial left anterior descending coronary artery lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.比较冠状动脉左前降支开口病变的交叉支架置入术与局灶性开口支架置入术:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2025 Feb 25;25(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s12872-024-04393-x.
2
Long-term outcomes following ostial left anterior descending artery intervention with or without crossover to left-main.左前降支开口处介入治疗(无论是否交叉至左主干)后的长期预后
Am J Cardiovasc Dis. 2022 Apr 15;12(2):73-80. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Three-dimensional virtual surgery models for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) optimization strategies.用于经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)优化策略的三维虚拟手术模型。
Sci Rep. 2015 Jun 4;5:10945. doi: 10.1038/srep10945.
2
Percutaneous treatment of aorto-ostial coronary lesions: Current challenges and future directions.经皮治疗主动脉开口处冠状动脉病变:当前挑战与未来方向。
Int J Cardiol. 2015;186:61-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.03.161. Epub 2015 Mar 17.
3
How bifurcation angle impacts the fate of side branch after main vessel stenting: a retrospective analysis of 1,200 consecutive bifurcation lesions in a single center.
主血管支架置入术后分叉角度如何影响分支血管的转归:单中心1200例连续性分叉病变的回顾性分析
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Mar;85 Suppl 1:706-15. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25858. Epub 2015 Feb 25.
4
Percutaneous coronary intervention for coronary bifurcation disease: consensus from the first 10 years of the European Bifurcation Club meetings.冠状动脉分叉病变的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:欧洲分叉俱乐部会议头10年的共识
EuroIntervention. 2014 Sep;10(5):545-60. doi: 10.4244/EIJV10I5A97.
5
Long-term outcomes of simple crossover stenting from the left main to the left anterior descending coronary artery.从左主干到左前降支冠状动脉进行简单交叉支架置入术的长期预后。
Korean J Intern Med. 2014 Sep;29(5):597-602. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2014.29.5.597. Epub 2014 Aug 28.
6
Single versus double stenting for unprotected left main coronary artery bifurcation lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.单支架与双支架治疗无保护左主干冠状动脉分叉病变:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
J Invasive Cardiol. 2014 Jun;26(6):229-33.
7
Side branch complication after a single-stent crossover technique: prediction with frequency domain optical coherence tomography.单支架交叉技术后的分支并发症:频域光学相干断层扫描预测
Coron Artery Dis. 2014 Jun;25(4):321-9. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000000091.
8
Differential prognostic impact of treatment strategy among patients with left main versus non-left main bifurcation lesions undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: results from the COBIS (Coronary Bifurcation Stenting) Registry II.左主干病变与非左主干分叉病变行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者的治疗策略对预后的影响差异:COBIS(冠状动脉分叉病变支架置入)注册研究 II 的结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Mar;7(3):255-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.11.009. Epub 2014 Feb 13.
9
Impact of 3-dimensional bifurcation angle on 5-year outcome of patients after percutaneous coronary intervention for left main coronary artery disease: a substudy of the SYNTAX trial (synergy between percutaneous coronary intervention with taxus and cardiac surgery).三维分叉角度对左主干冠状动脉疾病经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后 5 年预后的影响:SYNTAX 试验(紫杉醇药物洗脱支架与心脏搭桥术的联合治疗)的一项亚组研究。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Dec;6(12):1250-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.08.009.
10
Frequency-domain optical coherence tomography findings in patients with bifurcated lesions undergoing provisional stenting.接受临时支架置入术的分叉病变患者的频域光学相干断层扫描结果
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014 May;15(5):547-55. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jet231. Epub 2013 Nov 18.