• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

接受胸腔置管或滑石粉胸膜固定术治疗的恶性胸腔积液患者的生存差异

Survival Difference in Patients with Malignant Pleural Effusions Treated with Pleural Catheter or Talc Pleurodesis.

作者信息

Liou Douglas Z, Serna-Gallegos Derek, Chan Joshua L, Borgella Jerald, Akhmerov Shah, Soukiasian Harmik J

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Division of Thoracic Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.

出版信息

Am Surg. 2016 Oct;82(10):995-999.

PMID:27779992
Abstract

Malignant pleural effusions (MPE) are commonly managed with either pleural catheter (PC) or talc pleurodesis (TP). The aim of this study was to compare survival in MPE patients treated with either PC or TP. A retrospective review of our cancer center database was performed. Patients with metastatic cancer and MPE were analyzed. Demographic and clinical data were tabulated and compared. A total of 238 patients with MPE treated by either PC or TP were included. Of these, 79 patients comprised the PC group and 159 the TP group. PC had a higher incidence of advanced disease (stage III or IV) at initial diagnosis compared with TP (70.9% vs 57.2%, P = 0.05). TP had a longer postprocedure length of stay compared with PC (7.1 vs 5.0 days, P = 0.02); however, overall length of stay was similar (9.7 vs 11.1 days, P = 0.34). Readmissions were significantly lower in TP (11.9% vs 22.8%, P = 0.04). Mean survival was higher in TP compared with PC (18.7 vs 4.1 months, P < 0.001). Patients with metastatic cancer and MPE treated with TP had significantly higher survival compared with PC. This is likely related to a greater disease burden in PC, as 70 per cent of patients in this group had stage III or IV disease on initial presentation.

摘要

恶性胸腔积液(MPE)通常采用胸腔置管(PC)或滑石粉胸膜固定术(TP)进行治疗。本研究的目的是比较接受PC或TP治疗的MPE患者的生存率。我们对癌症中心数据库进行了回顾性分析。对患有转移性癌症和MPE的患者进行了分析。将人口统计学和临床数据制成表格并进行比较。共有238例接受PC或TP治疗的MPE患者被纳入研究。其中,79例患者组成PC组,159例组成TP组。与TP相比,PC在初诊时晚期疾病(III期或IV期)的发生率更高(70.9%对57.2%,P = 0.05)。与PC相比,TP术后住院时间更长(7.1天对5.0天,P = 0.02);然而,总住院时间相似(9.7天对11.1天,P = 0.34)。TP组的再入院率显著更低(11.9%对22.8%,P = 0.04)。TP组的平均生存期高于PC组(18.7个月对4.1个月,P < 0.001)。接受TP治疗的转移性癌症和MPE患者的生存率显著高于PC组。这可能与PC组更大的疾病负担有关,因为该组70%的患者在初次就诊时为III期或IV期疾病。

相似文献

1
Survival Difference in Patients with Malignant Pleural Effusions Treated with Pleural Catheter or Talc Pleurodesis.接受胸腔置管或滑石粉胸膜固定术治疗的恶性胸腔积液患者的生存差异
Am Surg. 2016 Oct;82(10):995-999.
2
A randomized controlled trial comparing indwelling pleural catheters with talc pleurodesis (NVALT-14).一项比较留置胸膜导管与滑石粉胸膜固定术的随机对照试验(NVALT - 14)。
Lung Cancer. 2017 Jun;108:9-14. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2017.01.019. Epub 2017 Feb 16.
3
Thoracoscopic talc versus tunneled pleural catheters for palliation of malignant pleural effusions.胸腔镜滑石粉与隧道式胸腔引流管治疗恶性胸腔积液的姑息疗效比较。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2012 Oct;94(4):1053-7; discussion 1057-9. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.01.103. Epub 2012 Apr 17.
4
Management of malignant pleural effusions with indwelling pleural catheters or talc pleurodesis.留置胸腔导管或滑石粉胸膜固定术治疗恶性胸腔积液。
Can Respir J. 2013 Mar-Apr;20(2):106-10. doi: 10.1155/2013/842768.
5
Impact of pleural effusion pH on the efficacy of thoracoscopic mechanical pleurodesis in patients with breast carcinoma.胸腔积液pH值对乳腺癌患者胸腔镜机械性胸膜固定术疗效的影响
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2004 Aug;26(2):432-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2004.03.010.
6
Indwelling pleural catheter versus talc pleurodesis for malignant pleural effusion: a meta-analysis.留置胸膜腔导管与滑石粉胸膜固定术治疗恶性胸腔积液的比较:一项荟萃分析。
Clin Exp Metastasis. 2020 Aug;37(4):541-549. doi: 10.1007/s10585-020-10042-2. Epub 2020 Jun 10.
7
Talc pleurodesis improves survival of patients with malignant pleural effusions: case-control study.滑石粉胸膜固定术可提高恶性胸腔积液患者的生存率:病例对照研究。
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2015 Dec;127(23-24):963-9. doi: 10.1007/s00508-015-0716-8. Epub 2015 Apr 10.
8
Talc poudrage versus talc slurry in the treatment of malignant pleural effusion. A prospective comparative study.滑石粉喷洒术与滑石粉浆治疗恶性胸腔积液的前瞻性对照研究。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2006 Dec;30(6):827-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2006.10.002.
9
What is the best treatment for malignant pleural effusions?恶性胸腔积液的最佳治疗方法是什么?
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2011 May;12(5):818-23. doi: 10.1510/icvts.2010.254789. Epub 2011 Feb 16.
10
Talc pleurodesis as surgical palliation of patients with malignant pleural effusion. Analysis of factors affecting survival.滑石粉胸膜固定术作为恶性胸腔积液患者的姑息性手术。影响生存的因素分析。
Anticancer Res. 2012 Nov;32(11):5071-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost Comparison of Treatment Alternatives for Pleural Effusion and Ascites from a Payer Perspective: Are There Cost Savings from Indwelling Catheters?从支付者角度比较胸腔积液和腹水治疗选择的成本:留置导管是否有成本节约?
J Palliat Med. 2023 Nov;26(11):1510-1520. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2022.0592. Epub 2023 Jun 23.
2
Talc pleurodesis versus indwelling pleural catheter among patients with malignant pleural effusion: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.滑石粉胸膜固定术与留置胸膜导管治疗恶性胸腔积液的比较:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
World J Surg Oncol. 2020 Jul 23;18(1):184. doi: 10.1186/s12957-020-01940-6.
3
Indwelling pleural catheter versus talc pleurodesis for malignant pleural effusion: a meta-analysis.
留置胸膜腔导管与滑石粉胸膜固定术治疗恶性胸腔积液的比较:一项荟萃分析。
Clin Exp Metastasis. 2020 Aug;37(4):541-549. doi: 10.1007/s10585-020-10042-2. Epub 2020 Jun 10.