Kühlein T, Madlo-Thiess F, Wambach V, Schaffer S
Allgemeinmedizinisches Institut, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen.
Medizinische Fakultät, Allgemeinmedizinisches Institut, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen.
Gesundheitswesen. 2018 Mar;80(3):226-231. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-116223. Epub 2016 Oct 25.
Quality management (QM) became mandatory for the ambulatory sector of the German health care system 10 years ago.
The aim of this study was to find out how general practitioners (GPs) perceived the introduction of this measure, how they see it today and what they expect of the future concerning QM.
In a qualitative study, interviews following a semi-structured guideline with GPs were conducted. Following transcription, interviews were coded in triangulation, first inductively, then deductively until saturation was reached. Main topics and code families were agreed on after discussion.
There was consensus on the necessity of standardization of basic processes like hygiene. However, the application of QM to an activity that emphasizes personal relationships and communication was seen as barely possible. GPs stated that they reduced QM to a tolerable and for them reasonable minimum. GPs mostly refused certification. The next 10 years were seen with pessimism in terms of more bureaucratic guidelines.
The statutory introduction of QM was an attack on medical professionalism. Instead of passive resistance and reduction of QM to a minimum, engaged independent quality work might help to regain the trust of society we seem to have lost and restore the professional autonomy we need for our work.
质量管理(QM)在10年前成为德国医疗保健系统门诊部门的强制要求。
本研究的目的是了解全科医生(GPs)如何看待这一措施的引入,他们如今如何看待它,以及他们对质量管理的未来期望。
在一项定性研究中,按照半结构化指南对全科医生进行访谈。转录后,对访谈进行三角编码,首先是归纳编码,然后是演绎编码,直至达到饱和。讨论后确定主要主题和编码类别。
对于诸如卫生等基本流程标准化的必要性存在共识。然而,将质量管理应用于强调人际关系和沟通的活动几乎被视为不可能。全科医生表示,他们将质量管理降至可容忍且对他们而言合理的最低限度。全科医生大多拒绝认证。就更多官僚主义指南而言,对未来10年持悲观态度。
法定引入质量管理是对医学专业性的一种冲击。与其消极抵制并将质量管理降至最低限度,积极主动的独立质量工作可能有助于重新赢得我们似乎已失去的社会信任,并恢复我们工作所需的职业自主性。