Suppr超能文献

腹腔镜与开放全结肠切除回直肠吻合术的短期结局:来自全国性数据库的病例匹配分析

Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open total colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis: a case-matched analysis from a nationwide database.

作者信息

Onder A, Benlice C, Church J, Kessler H, Gorgun E

机构信息

Department of Colorectal Surgery, Digestive Disease Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave. A-30, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.

出版信息

Tech Coloproctol. 2016 Nov;20(11):767-773. doi: 10.1007/s10151-016-1539-y. Epub 2016 Oct 25.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In the current study, we aimed to compare peri- and postoperative 30-day outcomes of patients undergoing laparoscopic versus open total colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis in a case-matched design using data procedure-targeted database.

METHODS

Patients who underwent elective total colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis in 2012 and 2013 were identified from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Patients were divided into two groups according to the type of surgical approach (laparoscopic and open). Laparoscopic and open groups were matched (1:1) based on age, gender, diagnosis, body mass index, and American Society of Anesthesiologists classification. Comorbidities, perioperative, and short-term (30-day) postoperative outcomes were compared between the matched groups.

RESULTS

We identified 1442 patients-549 in the laparoscopic group and 893 patients in the open group. After case matching, there were 326 patients in each group. There were 48 (14.7%) patients who had conversion in the laparoscopic group. The open group had a higher proportion of patients with ascites [0 (0%) vs. 7 (2.1%) p = 0.015], preoperative weight loss [26 (8.0%) vs. 45 (13.8%) p = 0.018], and contaminated wound classifications [Clean/Contaminated 261 (80%) vs. 240 (74%), Contaminated 55 (16.9%) vs. 54 (16.6%), and Dirty/Infected 8 (2.5%) vs. 28 (8.6%), (p = 0.003)]. The laparoscopic group had a significantly longer operative time (242 ± 98 vs. 202 ± 116 min, p < 0.001), shorter hospital stay (9.4 ± 8.5 vs. 13.3 ± 10.7 days, p < 0.001), and lower ileus rate (23.9 vs. 31.0%, p = 0.045) than the open group. After adjusting for covariates, the differences in terms of operative time and hospital stay remained significant [odds ratio (OR): 0.79, confidence interval (CI) 0.74-0.85 and OR 1.36, CI 1.21-1.52, p < 0.001, respectively].

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic approach for total colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis is associated with a shorter hospital stay but longer operative time compared with an open approach.

摘要

背景

在本研究中,我们旨在通过使用数据程序靶向数据库,采用病例匹配设计,比较接受腹腔镜与开放全结肠切除术并回肠直肠吻合术患者的围手术期和术后30天结局。

方法

从美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进计划数据库中识别出2012年和2013年接受择期全结肠切除术并回肠直肠吻合术的患者。根据手术方式(腹腔镜和开放)将患者分为两组。腹腔镜组和开放组根据年龄、性别、诊断、体重指数和美国麻醉医师协会分级进行(1:1)匹配。比较匹配组之间的合并症、围手术期和短期(30天)术后结局。

结果

我们识别出1442例患者——腹腔镜组549例,开放组893例。病例匹配后,每组有326例患者。腹腔镜组有48例(14.7%)患者转为开放手术。开放组腹水患者比例更高[0(0%)对7例(2.1%),p = 0.015],术前体重减轻患者比例更高[26例(8.0%)对45例(13.8%),p = 0.018],以及污染伤口分类更多[清洁/污染261例(80%)对240例(74%),污染55例(16.9%)对54例(16.6%),以及脏污/感染8例(2.5%)对28例(8.6%),(p = 0.003)]。与开放组相比,腹腔镜组手术时间显著更长(242±98对202±116分钟,p < 0.001),住院时间更短(9.4±8.5对13.3±10.7天,p < 0.001),肠梗阻发生率更低(23.9%对31.0%,p = 0.045)。在调整协变量后,手术时间和住院时间的差异仍然显著[优势比(OR):0.79,置信区间(CI)0.74 - 0.85和OR 1.36,CI 1.21 - 1.52,p < 0.001,分别]。

结论

与开放手术相比,腹腔镜全结肠切除术并回肠直肠吻合术与较短的住院时间相关,但手术时间更长。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验