Isoda Hiroyoshi, Furuta Akihiro, Ohno Tsuyoshi, Togashi Kaori
Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Acta Radiol. 2017 Jul;58(7):786-791. doi: 10.1177/0284185116674500. Epub 2016 Oct 26.
Background In non-contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) arteriography, the flow-out method using a selective tagging pulse with a long inversion time (TI) and a non-selective inversion recovery pulse with a short TI (the modified flow-out method) might further contribute to the suppression of background signal and facilitate improved visualization of the hepatic artery. However, no report has focused on the image quality of non-contrast-enhanced MR arteriography using the modified flow-out method. Purpose To compare the flow-in method with the modified flow-out method and to determine which method better visualizes the hepatic artery. Material and Methods Twenty-seven healthy volunteers were examined using respiratory-triggered three-dimensional true steady-state free-precession MR with two selective inversion recovery pulses (the flow-in method) or with one tagging pulse and one non-selective inversion recovery pulse (the modified flow-out method). Results Artery-to-liver contrast was significantly increased in the modified flow-out method relative to the flow-in method ( P < 0.05). In all analyses of vessel visibility, non-contrast-enhanced MR arteriography using the modified flow-out method exhibited higher scores than with the flow-in method. With respect to overall image quality, the modified flow-out method was significantly better than the flow-in method ( P < 0.01). Conclusion The modified flow-out method for non-contrast-enhanced MR angiography is a promising technique for visualizing the hepatic artery.
在非增强磁共振(MR)血管造影中,采用具有长反转时间(TI)的选择性标记脉冲和短TI的非选择性反转恢复脉冲的流出法(改良流出法)可能进一步有助于抑制背景信号,并有利于改善肝动脉的可视化。然而,尚无报告关注使用改良流出法的非增强MR血管造影的图像质量。目的:比较流入法和改良流出法,确定哪种方法能更好地显示肝动脉。材料与方法:对27名健康志愿者进行呼吸触发的三维真稳态自由进动MR检查,分别采用两个选择性反转恢复脉冲(流入法)或一个标记脉冲和一个非选择性反转恢复脉冲(改良流出法)。结果:改良流出法相对于流入法,动脉-肝脏对比显著增加(P < 0.05)。在所有血管可视性分析中,使用改良流出法的非增强MR血管造影得分高于流入法。在整体图像质量方面,改良流出法明显优于流入法(P < 0.01)。结论:非增强MR血管造影的改良流出法是一种显示肝动脉的有前景的技术。