Ivanir Yair, Trobe Jonathan D
Departments of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences (YI), Kellogg Eye Center, University of Michigan; and Department of Neurology (YI, JDT), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
J Neuroophthalmol. 2017 Dec;37(4):365-368. doi: 10.1097/WNO.0000000000000460.
Isolated fourth nerve palsies are commonly caused by decompensation of a congenitally dysfunctional superior oblique muscle ("decompensated congenital palsies"). Distinguishing such palsies at initial presentation from palsies caused by presumed microvascular ischemia ("ischemic palsies") has value for patient reassurance and in forestalling ancillary testing. Abnormally large vertical fusional amplitudes traditionally have been used to identify decompensated congenital palsies, but that may not be a reliable distinguishing feature. This study was undertaken to determine if the amount of hypertropia in upgaze and downgaze might be a more efficient separator. We also studied traumatic and tumorous fourth nerve palsies to see if they could be distinguished from decompensated congenital palsies by using this hypertropia comparison.
Retrospective review of case records of patients diagnosed with isolated fourth nerve palsies at the University of Michigan Neuro-Ophthalmology Clinics over the past 15 years. We recorded the age, gender, vascular risk factors, duration of follow-up, cause, side of palsy, and alignment measurements in all patients.
Inclusion criteria were met by 118 patients. Hypertropia was equal or greater in upgaze than downgaze in 50 of the 58 decompensated congenital palsies (86%) in whom those data were recorded. Hypertropia was never greatest in upgaze in the 15 patients with traumatic palsies. Vertical fusional amplitudes were increased in only 15 of 27 patients (56%) with decompensated palsies in whom those data were recorded. Torsional misalignment on double Maddox rod testing was present in 16 (94%), 13 (87%), and 3 (100%) patients with ischemic, traumatic, and tumorous palsies, but also in 19 patients (54%) with decompensated congenital palsies in whom those data were recorded.
Hypertropia greater in upgaze than downgaze or equal in upgaze and downgaze was an efficient separator of congenital from ischemic and tumorous fourth nerve palsies, being characteristic of patients with decompensated congenital palsies and never present in patients with ischemic, traumatic, or tumorous palsies. Vertical fusional amplitudes and torsional misalignment did not effectively differentiate between the patient groups. Comparing the hypertropia in upgaze and downgaze improved differential diagnosis and reduces the potential for unnecessary ancillary tests.
孤立性滑车神经麻痹通常由先天性功能异常的上斜肌失代偿引起(“失代偿性先天性麻痹”)。在初次就诊时将此类麻痹与推测由微血管缺血引起的麻痹(“缺血性麻痹”)区分开来,对于安抚患者以及避免进行不必要的辅助检查具有重要意义。传统上,异常大的垂直融合幅度被用于识别失代偿性先天性麻痹,但这可能不是一个可靠的鉴别特征。本研究旨在确定上视和下视时的上斜视度数是否可能是一种更有效的鉴别指标。我们还研究了创伤性和肿瘤性滑车神经麻痹,以探讨能否通过比较上斜视度数将它们与失代偿性先天性麻痹区分开来。
回顾性分析过去15年在密歇根大学神经眼科诊所诊断为孤立性滑车神经麻痹的患者病历。我们记录了所有患者的年龄、性别、血管危险因素、随访时间、病因、麻痹侧别以及眼位测量结果。
118例患者符合纳入标准。在记录了相关数据的58例失代偿性先天性麻痹患者中,有50例(86%)上视时的上斜视度数等于或大于下视时的度数。在15例创伤性麻痹患者中,上视时的上斜视度数从未最大。在记录了相关数据的27例失代偿性麻痹患者中,仅有15例(56%)的垂直融合幅度增加。在缺血性、创伤性和肿瘤性麻痹患者中,分别有16例(94%)、13例(87%)和3例(100%)在双马多克斯杆试验中存在扭转性斜视,但在记录了相关数据的19例失代偿性先天性麻痹患者中也有19例(54%)存在扭转性斜视。
上视时的上斜视度数大于下视或上视与下视时相等,是先天性滑车神经麻痹与缺血性和肿瘤性麻痹的有效鉴别指标,是失代偿性先天性麻痹患者的特征,而在缺血性、创伤性或肿瘤性麻痹患者中从未出现。垂直融合幅度和扭转性斜视不能有效区分不同患者组。比较上视和下视时的上斜视度数可改善鉴别诊断并减少不必要的辅助检查的可能性。