Behmenburg Friederike, Heinen André, Bruch Lilli Vom, Hollmann Markus W, Huhn Ragnar
Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospital Duesseldorf Moorenstr, Duesseldorf, Germany.
Institute of Cardiovascular Physiology, Heinrich-Heine University Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany.
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2017 Aug;31(4):1223-1226. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2016.07.005. Epub 2016 Jul 7.
In animal studies, remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) is a powerful tool to protect the heart from ischemia and reperfusion injury. Unfortunately, this effect was not seen consistently in recent large clinical trials. Aging was shown to be a confounding factor for the effect of direct preconditioning in experimental studies, but whether aging also can influence the effect of RIPC and thus be responsible for the contradictory clinical effect is unknown. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the cardioprotective effect of RIPC was abolished by aging.
Randomized, prospective, blinded laboratory investigation.
Experimental laboratory.
Male Wistar rats.
Anesthetized young (Y, 2-3 months) and aged (A, 22-24 months) male Wistar rats were randomized to 4 groups (n = 6 per group). Control animals (Y-Con and A-Con) were not treated further; RIPC groups (Y-RIPC and A-RIPC) received 4 cycles of 5 minutes of bilateral hind limb ischemia interspersed with 5 minutes reperfusion before myocardial ischemia and reperfusion. All animals underwent 25 minutes of regional myocardial ischemia and 120 minutes of reperfusion. At the end of reperfusion, infarct size was determined by TTC staining.
In the control group of young rats, infarct size was 56±9% of the area at risk. RIPC reduced infarct size to 31±9% (p<0.05 v Y-Con). Cardioprotection by RIPC was abolished completely in the aged rat heart (A-RIPC: 62±8%, A-Con: 63±4%; ns).
The results of the authors' study showed that cardioprotection induced by remote ischemic preconditioning was blocked in the aged rat heart.
在动物研究中,远程缺血预处理(RIPC)是保护心脏免受缺血再灌注损伤的有力工具。不幸的是,这种效果在近期的大型临床试验中并未始终如一。在实验研究中,衰老被证明是直接预处理效果的一个混杂因素,但衰老是否也会影响RIPC的效果,从而导致临床效果相互矛盾尚不清楚。本研究的目的是调查RIPC的心脏保护作用是否会因衰老而被消除。
随机、前瞻性、盲法实验室研究。
实验实验室。
雄性Wistar大鼠。
将麻醉后的年轻(Y,2 - 3个月)和老年(A,22 - 24个月)雄性Wistar大鼠随机分为4组(每组n = 6)。对照组动物(Y-Con和A-Con)不再接受进一步处理;RIPC组(Y-RIPC和A-RIPC)在心肌缺血和再灌注前接受4个周期的双侧后肢缺血5分钟,期间穿插5分钟再灌注。所有动物均经历25分钟的局部心肌缺血和120分钟的再灌注。在再灌注结束时,通过TTC染色确定梗死面积。
在年轻大鼠对照组中,梗死面积为危险区域面积的56±9%。RIPC将梗死面积降至31±9%(与Y-Con相比,p<0.05)。在老年大鼠心脏中,RIPC的心脏保护作用完全消失(A-RIPC:62±8%,A-Con:63±4%;无显著性差异)。
作者的研究结果表明,远程缺血预处理诱导的心脏保护作用在老年大鼠心脏中被阻断。