Alireza Mohannat, Amelot Aymeric, Chauvet Dorian, Terrier Louis-Marie, Lot Guillaume, Bekaert Olivier
Department of Neurosurgery, Fondation Rothschild, Paris, France.
Department of Neurosurgery, Fondation Rothschild, Paris, France.
World Neurosurg. 2017 Jan;97:751.e1-751.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.10.083. Epub 2016 Oct 25.
Malignant optic glioma of adulthood is a rare, invasive neoplasm of the anterior visual pathway. In this article, the clinical features of a case series of 3 malignant optic nerve glioblastomas (World Health Organization grade IV) are presented, and the modalities of treatment and their associated survivals are discussed through a review of the existing literature to date.
A retrospective case series study was led for 3 patients diagnosed with primary optic nerve and chiasm glioblastoma, coming from 2 referral neurosurgical centers. An electronic search was conducted on MEDLINE via PUBMED, COCHRANE, from October 1973 to April 2016. Cohort, case reports, and case series were screened for investigating treatment and overall survival (OS) of malignant optic nerve gliomas. Pooled means and 95% confidence intervals of OS for each treatment were generated.
From our retrospective case series, all patients had initial visual impairment (2 women and 1 man). The histologic diagnosis was done by biopsy. The patients' mean age was 67.3 years (standard deviation [SD] 18.5). The disease was rapidly lethal for all patients: median OS was 5 months (SD: 15.1). Two patients underwent chemotherapy by single cure of temozolomide, while the third one was treated with a radiochemotherapy protocol. Due to the fact that there is no gold standard treatment as first-choice treatment, a large heterogeneity in first-choice oncologic treatment is observed. However, we did not find any significant differences for OS between World Health Organization grade III and grade IV optic gliomas.
Malignant optic glioma is a rare and fatal disease in adults. Despite the modalities of treatment, the treatment outcomes remain unsatisfactory. There is no significant difference in the median OS of patients with malignant optic nerve, as compared with those diagnosed with other supratentorial glioblastoma. Chemoradiotherapy with temozolomide currently remains the best treatment in terms of OS. Advances in the understanding of tumor biology have yet failed to translate into effective treatment regimens.
成人恶性视神经胶质瘤是一种罕见的、侵袭性的前视觉通路肿瘤。本文报告了一组3例恶性视神经胶质母细胞瘤(世界卫生组织IV级)的临床特征,并通过回顾迄今为止的现有文献,讨论了治疗方式及其相关生存率。
对来自2个神经外科转诊中心的3例诊断为原发性视神经和视交叉胶质母细胞瘤的患者进行了回顾性病例系列研究。通过PUBMED、COCHRANE对1973年10月至2016年4月期间的MEDLINE进行了电子检索。筛选队列研究、病例报告和病例系列,以调查恶性视神经胶质瘤的治疗和总生存期(OS)。计算每种治疗方法的OS合并均值和95%置信区间。
在我们的回顾性病例系列中,所有患者均有初始视力障碍(2名女性和1名男性)。组织学诊断通过活检完成。患者的平均年龄为67.3岁(标准差[SD]18.5)。该疾病对所有患者来说都是快速致命的:中位OS为5个月(SD:15.1)。2例患者接受了替莫唑胺单药化疗,而第3例患者接受了放化疗方案。由于没有作为首选治疗的金标准治疗方法,因此观察到首选肿瘤治疗存在很大的异质性。然而,我们没有发现世界卫生组织III级和IV级视神经胶质瘤在OS方面有任何显著差异。
成人恶性视神经胶质瘤是一种罕见且致命的疾病。尽管有多种治疗方式,但治疗结果仍不尽人意。与诊断为其他幕上胶质母细胞瘤的患者相比,恶性视神经患者的中位OS没有显著差异。就OS而言,替莫唑胺放化疗目前仍然是最佳治疗方法。对肿瘤生物学理解的进展尚未转化为有效的治疗方案。