Suppr超能文献

终末期住院血管外科患者的护理模式。

Patterns of Care in Hospitalized Vascular Surgery Patients at End of Life.

机构信息

Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Knight Cardiovascular Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland.

Decedent Affairs, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland.

出版信息

JAMA Surg. 2017 Feb 1;152(2):183-190. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.3970.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

There is limited literature reporting circumstances surrounding end-of-life care in vascular surgery patients.

OBJECTIVE

To identify factors driving end-of-life decisions in vascular surgery patients.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In this cohort study, medical records were reviewed for all vascular surgery patients at a tertiary care university hospital who died during their hospitalization from 2005 to 2014.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Patient, family, and hospitalization variables potentially important to influencing end-of-life decisions.

RESULTS

Of 111 patients included (67 [60%] male; median age, 75 [range, 24-94] years), 81 (73%) were emergent vs 30 (27%) elective admissions. Only 15 (14%) had an advance directive. Of the 81 (73%) patients placed on comfort care, 31 (38%) had care withheld or withdrawn despite available medical options, 15 (19%) had an advance directive, and 28 (25%) had a palliative care consultation. The median time from palliative care consultation to death was 10 hours (interquartile range, 3.36-66 hours). Comparing the 31 patients placed on comfort care despite available medical options with an admission diagnosis-matched cohort, we found that more than 5 days admitted to the intensive care unit (odds ratio [OR], 4.11; 95% CI, 1.59-10.68; P < .001), more than 5 days requiring ventilator support (OR, 9.45; 95% CI, 3.41-26.18; P < .001), new renal failure necessitating dialysis (OR, 14.48; 95% CI, 3.69-56.86; P < .001), and new respiratory failure necessitating tracheostomy (OR, 23.92; 95% CI, 2.80-204; P < .001) correlated with transition to comfort care.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Palliative care consultations may be underused at the end of life. A large percentage of patients were transitioned to comfort measures despite available treatment, yet few presented with advance directives. In high-risk patients, discussions regarding extended stays in the intensive care unit, prolonged ventilator management, and possible dialysis and tracheostomy should be communicated with patients and families at time of hospitalization and advance directives solicited.

摘要

重要性

有关血管外科患者临终关怀情况的文献有限。

目的

确定影响血管外科患者临终决策的因素。

设计、地点和参与者:在这项队列研究中,回顾了 2005 年至 2014 年期间在一家三级护理大学医院住院期间死亡的所有血管外科患者的医疗记录。

主要结果和措施

可能对影响临终决策有重要影响的患者、家属和住院相关变量。

结果

在纳入的 111 名患者中(67 [60%] 为男性;中位年龄为 75 [范围,24-94] 岁),81 名(73%)为紧急入院,30 名(27%)为择期入院。只有 15 名(14%)有预先指示。在 81 名(73%)接受舒适护理的患者中,尽管有可用的医疗选择,但仍有 31 名(38%)停止或撤回治疗,其中 15 名(19%)有预先指示,28 名(25%)接受了姑息治疗咨询。从姑息治疗咨询到死亡的中位时间为 10 小时(四分位距,3.36-66 小时)。将 31 名尽管有可用医疗选择但仍接受舒适护理的患者与入院诊断相匹配的队列进行比较,我们发现:入住重症监护病房超过 5 天(比值比 [OR],4.11;95%置信区间 [CI],1.59-10.68;P<.001)、需要呼吸机支持超过 5 天(OR,9.45;95%CI,3.41-26.18;P<.001)、新出现需要透析的肾功能衰竭(OR,14.48;95%CI,3.69-56.86;P<.001)和新出现需要气管切开术的呼吸衰竭(OR,23.92;95%CI,2.80-204;P<.001)与过渡到舒适护理相关。

结论和相关性

姑息治疗咨询在生命末期可能使用不足。尽管有治疗方法,但很大一部分患者被过渡到舒适治疗,但很少有患者有预先指示。对于高危患者,应在住院时与患者和家属讨论入住重症监护病房时间延长、长时间使用呼吸机以及可能需要透析和气管切开术的问题,并征求预先指示。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验