Noventa Marco, Gizzo Salvatore, Saccardi Carlo, Borgato Shara, Vitagliano Amerigo, Quaranta Michela, Litta Pietro, Gangemi Michele, Ambrosini Guido, D'Antona Donato, Palomba Stefano
Department of Woman and Child Health, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, NHS Trust - Northampton General Hospital, Northampton, United Kingdom.
J Ovarian Res. 2016 Nov 3;9(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s13048-016-0284-1.
Salpingectomy is largely used in case of hydrosalpinx in infertile women scheduled for assisted reproductive technologies (ART), whereas there is no consensus on its role in absence of hydrosalpinx. The current is a systematic literature review to collate all available evidence regarding salpingectomy as fertility enhancement procedure before ART in infertile patients. Our primary endpoint was to assess the impact of the surgical procedure on ovarian reserve, and secondary outcomes were to evaluate its benefits and harms on ART outcomes. We identified 29 papers of which 16 reporting data on the impact of tubal surgery on ovarian reserve and 24 (11 previously included) on ART outcomes. Available data suggested an absence of variation in ovarian reserve markers after unilateral salpingectomy while contradictory results were reported for bilateral surgery. Considering ART outcomes, data reported a significant improvement in ongoing pregnancy/live-birth rate in treated subjects without significant reduction in ovarian response to gonadotropin stimulation. In case of tubal disease, a surgical approach based on unilateral salpingectomy may be considered safe, without negative effects on ovarian reserve and ovarian response to controlled ovarian stimulation whilst having a positive effect on pregnancy rate. Data regarding bilateral salpingectomy and ovarian reserve are conflicting. Further trials are needed to confirm both the benefits of salpingectomy before ART and the safety of bilateral salpingectomy on ovarian reserve, and to clarify the role of uni- or bilateral surgery in case of tubal blockage without hydrosalpinx.
输卵管切除术主要用于计划接受辅助生殖技术(ART)的不孕女性输卵管积水的情况,而对于其在无输卵管积水情况下的作用尚无共识。本研究是一项系统的文献综述,旨在整理关于输卵管切除术作为不孕患者ART前提高生育力手术的所有现有证据。我们的主要终点是评估手术对卵巢储备的影响,次要结果是评估其对ART结局的益处和危害。我们确定了29篇论文,其中16篇报告了输卵管手术对卵巢储备影响的数据,24篇(其中11篇先前已纳入)报告了对ART结局的影响。现有数据表明,单侧输卵管切除术后卵巢储备标志物无变化,而双侧手术则报告了相互矛盾的结果。考虑到ART结局,数据显示治疗组的持续妊娠/活产率有显著提高,而对促性腺激素刺激的卵巢反应无显著降低。对于输卵管疾病,基于单侧输卵管切除术的手术方法可能被认为是安全的,对卵巢储备和卵巢对控制性卵巢刺激的反应没有负面影响,同时对妊娠率有积极影响。关于双侧输卵管切除术和卵巢储备的数据相互矛盾。需要进一步的试验来证实ART前输卵管切除术的益处以及双侧输卵管切除术对卵巢储备的安全性,并阐明在无输卵管积水的输卵管阻塞情况下单侧或双侧手术的作用。