Suppr超能文献

一项评价长期治疗后奥马珠单抗持续应答的随机多中心研究。

A randomized multicenter study evaluating Xolair persistence of response after long-term therapy.

机构信息

Morsani College of Medicine and James A. Haley VA Hospital, University of South Florida, Tampa, Fla.

University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis.

出版信息

J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2017 Jul;140(1):162-169.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2016.08.054. Epub 2016 Nov 5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Few data are available to assist clinicians with decisions regarding long-term use of asthma therapies, including omalizumab.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to evaluate the benefit and persistence of response in subjects continuing or withdrawing from long-term omalizumab treatment.

METHODS

Evaluating the Xolair Persistency Of Response After Long-Term Therapy (XPORT) was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled withdrawal study that included subjects with moderate-to-severe persistent asthma receiving long-term omalizumab. Subjects were randomized by using a hierarchical dynamic randomization scheme to continue their same dose of omalizumab or withdraw to placebo and were then followed every 4 weeks for 1 year. The primary outcome was any protocol-defined severe asthma exacerbation. The secondary outcome was time to first protocol-defined severe asthma exacerbation. Exploratory outcomes included changes in Asthma Control Questionnaire and Asthma Control Test scores.

RESULTS

Significantly more subjects in the omalizumab group (67%) had no protocol-defined exacerbation than in the placebo group (47.7%); an absolute difference of 19.3% (95% CI, 5.0%, 33.6%) represents a 40.1% relative difference. Time to first protocol-defined exacerbation analysis revealed a significantly different between-group exacerbation pattern that was consistent with the primary analysis. Subjects continuing omalizumab had significantly better asthma control (mean [SD] change from baseline to week 52: Asthma Control Test score, -1.16 [4.14] vs placebo, -2.88 [5.38], P = .0188; Asthma Control Questionnaire score, 0.22 [0.66] vs placebo, 0.63 [1.13], P = .0039). Discontinuation of omalizumab was associated with an increase in free IgE levels and an increase in basophil expression of the high-affinity IgE receptor. No safety concerns were noted.

CONCLUSION

Continuation of omalizumab after long-term treatment results in continued benefit, as evidenced by improved symptom control and reduced exacerbation risk.

摘要

背景

关于哮喘治疗的长期使用,包括奥马珠单抗,可供临床医生参考的资料有限。

目的

我们旨在评估继续或停止奥马珠单抗长期治疗的患者的获益和反应持久性。

方法

评估长期治疗后奥马珠单抗持续性应答(XPORT)是一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照的停药研究,纳入接受长期奥马珠单抗治疗的中重度持续性哮喘患者。患者采用分层动态随机分组方案随机分组,继续使用相同剂量的奥马珠单抗或转为安慰剂,并随后每 4 周随访 1 年。主要结局是任何方案定义的重度哮喘恶化。次要结局是首次方案定义的重度哮喘恶化时间。探索性结局包括哮喘控制问卷和哮喘控制测试评分的变化。

结果

奥马珠单抗组(67%)发生方案定义的重度哮喘恶化的患者显著多于安慰剂组(47.7%);绝对差异为 19.3%(95%CI,5.0%,33.6%),代表 40.1%的相对差异。首次方案定义的重度哮喘恶化时间分析显示,两组间的恶化模式存在显著差异,与主要分析一致。继续接受奥马珠单抗治疗的患者哮喘控制明显改善(从基线到第 52 周的平均[SD]变化:哮喘控制测试评分,-1.16[4.14] vs 安慰剂,-2.88[5.38],P =.0188;哮喘控制问卷评分,0.22[0.66] vs 安慰剂,0.63[1.13],P =.0039)。奥马珠单抗的停用与游离 IgE 水平升高和高亲和力 IgE 受体的嗜碱性粒细胞表达增加有关。未观察到安全性问题。

结论

长期治疗后继续使用奥马珠单抗可带来持续获益,表现为症状控制改善和恶化风险降低。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验