Suppr超能文献

再次暴露于臭氧时反应性增强的持续时间。

Duration of enhanced responsiveness upon re-exposure to ozone.

作者信息

Schonfeld B R, Adams W C, Schelegle E S

机构信息

Department of Physical Education, University of California, Davis.

出版信息

Arch Environ Health. 1989 Jul-Aug;44(4):229-36. doi: 10.1080/00039896.1989.9935888.

Abstract

It has been repeatedly observed that ozone (O3) re-exposure within 24 h elicits enhanced pulmonary function responses. However, there are only limited observations concerning re-exposure to O3 at intervals between 24 h and several days. The present study was designed to assess the effects of re-exposure to 0.35 ppm O3 at intervals of 24, 48, 72, and 120 h. Forty young adult male subjects were assigned randomly to one of four groups in ascending order of time to re-exposure (groups 1-4). Each exercised on a bicycle ergometer for 60 min at a workload that elicited a mean ventilation of 60 l/min on three occasions: protocol 1 (P1), filtered air (FA); protocol 2 (P2), 0.35 ppm O3; and protocol 3 (P3), 0.35 ppm O3. In addition to standard pulmonary function measures, specific airway resistance (SRaw); exercise ventilatory pattern, i.e., respiratory frequency (fR) and tidal volume (VT); and subjective symptoms (SS) were assessed. Statistical analysis revealed significant differences (p less than .05) for all groups between the FA (P1) responses and those for the two O3 exposures (P2, P3) for forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1.0), SRaw, fR, VT, and SS. When the two O3 exposures (P2 and P3) were compared, only group 1 (24 h) responses were statistically significant upon re-exposure: FEV1.0, -16.1 vs. -30.4% (p less than .003); SRaw, 20.5 vs. 34.5% (p less than .05); fR, 44.2 vs. 65.3% (p less than .001); and SS (p less than .015).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

人们反复观察到,在24小时内再次接触臭氧(O3)会引发增强的肺功能反应。然而,关于在24小时至数天的间隔内再次接触O3的观察结果有限。本研究旨在评估以24、48、72和120小时为间隔再次接触0.35 ppm O3的影响。40名年轻成年男性受试者按再次接触时间的升序随机分为四组(1 - 4组)。每组在自行车测力计上以能引起平均通气量为60升/分钟的工作量进行60分钟运动,共进行三次:方案1(P1),过滤空气(FA);方案2(P2),0.35 ppm O3;方案3(P3),0.35 ppm O3。除了标准肺功能测量外,还评估了比气道阻力(SRaw)、运动通气模式,即呼吸频率(fR)和潮气量(VT)以及主观症状(SS)。统计分析显示,所有组在过滤空气(P1)反应与两次O3暴露(P2、P3)反应之间,在用力肺活量(FVC)、第1秒用力呼气量(FEV1.0)、SRaw、fR、VT和SS方面存在显著差异(p小于0.05)。当比较两次O3暴露(P2和P3)时,只有第1组(24小时)在再次接触时反应具有统计学意义:FEV1.0,-16.1%对-30.4%(p小于0.003);SRaw,20.5%对34.5%(p小于0.05);fR,44.2%对65.3%(p小于0.001);以及SS(p小于0.015)。(摘要截于250字)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验