Courneya Kerry S, McNeil Jessica, O'Reilly Rachel, Morielli Andria R, Friedenreich Christine M
Faculty of Physical Education and Recreation, University of Alberta, 1-113 University Hall, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2H9, Canada.
Department of Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Research, CancerControl Alberta, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Ann Behav Med. 2017 Jun;51(3):356-364. doi: 10.1007/s12160-016-9859-8.
BACKGROUND: Exercise generally improves quality of life (QoL) and psychosocial functioning in adult populations but few randomized trials have examined dose-response effects. PURPOSE: The purpose of the present study was to report the QoL and psychosocial outcomes from the Breast Cancer and Exercise Trial in Alberta (BETA). METHODS: Healthy but inactive postmenopausal women at risk for breast cancer were randomized to a year-long aerobic exercise intervention consisting of either 150 min/week (moderate volume group, n = 200) or 300 min/week (high volume group, n = 200). QoL was assessed at baseline and 1 year using the short form-36 health survey. Sleep quality, depression, anxiety, stress, self-esteem, and happiness were also assessed. Participant preference for group assignment (i.e., exercise volume) was assessed at baseline and tested as a moderator. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant dose-response effects of aerobic exercise on any QoL, sleep quality, or psychosocial outcome. Participant preference for group assignment did not moderate any QoL, sleep quality, or psychosocial responses. Marital status was a significant moderator (p for interaction = 0.01) and obesity showed a trend towards being a moderator (p for interaction = 0.08) of the dose-response effects of aerobic exercise on global sleep quality such that unmarried and obese women improved sleep quality with the higher volume of aerobic exercise. CONCLUSIONS: A higher volume of aerobic exercise, approximately double the minimum public health guideline, did not provide additional QoL or psychosocial benefits compared to the minimum public health guideline in inactive postmenopausal women, even for women who preferred the higher volume of exercise at baseline. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial Registration clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT1435005.
背景:运动通常能改善成年人群的生活质量(QoL)和心理社会功能,但很少有随机试验研究剂量反应效应。 目的:本研究旨在报告阿尔伯塔省乳腺癌与运动试验(BETA)的生活质量和心理社会结果。 方法:有患乳腺癌风险的健康但不运动的绝经后女性被随机分配到为期一年的有氧运动干预组,其中一组为每周150分钟(中等运动量组,n = 200),另一组为每周300分钟(高运动量组,n = 200)。使用简短健康调查问卷-36在基线和1年后评估生活质量。还评估了睡眠质量、抑郁、焦虑、压力、自尊和幸福感。在基线时评估参与者对分组(即运动量)的偏好,并将其作为调节变量进行测试。 结果:有氧运动对任何生活质量、睡眠质量或心理社会结果均无统计学显著的剂量反应效应。参与者对分组的偏好并未调节任何生活质量、睡眠质量或心理社会反应。婚姻状况是一个显著的调节变量(交互作用p = 0.01),肥胖对有氧运动对总体睡眠质量的剂量反应效应显示出成为调节变量的趋势(交互作用p = 0.08),即未婚和肥胖女性通过更高运动量的有氧运动改善了睡眠质量。 结论:与最低公共卫生指南相比,更高运动量的有氧运动(约为最低公共卫生指南的两倍)在不运动的绝经后女性中并未带来额外的生活质量或心理社会效益,即使是那些在基线时更喜欢更高运动量运动的女性。 试验注册:试验注册 clinicaltrials.gov 标识符:NCT1435005。
BMC Cancer. 2014-12-6
J Phys Act Health. 2017-11-27
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2018-3-21
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011-10-25
Health Psychol Behav Med. 2022-9-25
Cancers (Basel). 2020-12-28
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020-9-22
J Sport Health Sci. 2019-9
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2018-3-21