Suppr超能文献

土耳其骨科论文分析:证据水平与发表率

An analysis of orthopaedic theses in Turkey: Evidence levels and publication rates.

作者信息

Koca Kenan, Ekinci Safak, Akpancar Serkan, Gemci Muhammed Hanifi, Erşen Ömer, Akyıldız Faruk

机构信息

Gülhane Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.

Haydarpasa Sultan Abdulhamid Training and Research Hospitali İstanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2016 Oct;50(5):562-566. doi: 10.1016/j.aott.2016.03.001. Epub 2016 Nov 10.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to present characteristics and publication patterns of studies arise from orthopedic theses obtained from National Thesis Center; database in terms of publication years, study types, topics, level of evidence between 1974 and 2014.

METHODS

Firstly, National Thesis Center database was searched for orthopedics and Traumatology theses. The theses, which their summary or full text were available were included in the study. The topics, study types and quality of study designs were reviewed. Then theses were searched in the PubMed database. Journals of published theses were classified according to category, scope and impact factors of the year 2014.

RESULTS

1508 theses were included into the study. Clinical studies comprised 71,7% of the theses, while 25,6% of the theses were non-clinical experimental and 2,7% of the theses were observational studies. Clinical studies were Level I in 8,6% (n = 93) and Level II in 5,8% of the theses (n = 63). A total of 224 theses (14,9%) were published in the journals indexed in PubMed database from 1974 to 2012. Fifty-two (23,2%) were published in SCI; 136 theses (60,7%) were published in SCI-E journals and 36 theses (16%) were published in other Journals indexed in PubMed.

CONCLUSION

The quantity and quality of published theses need to be improved and effective measures should be taken to promote quality of theses. Theses from universities and Training hospitals which did not allow open access, and; incomplete records of the National Thesis Center database were major limitations of this study.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在呈现1974年至2014年间从国家论文中心数据库获取的骨科论文的研究特征及发表模式,包括发表年份、研究类型、主题和证据水平。

方法

首先,在国家论文中心数据库中检索骨科与创伤学论文。纳入那些有摘要或全文的论文。对主题、研究类型和研究设计质量进行审查。然后在PubMed数据库中检索这些论文。根据2014年期刊的类别、范围和影响因子对发表论文的期刊进行分类。

结果

1508篇论文纳入本研究。临床研究占论文总数的71.7%,非临床实验研究占25.6%,观察性研究占2.7%。临床研究中I级证据的论文占8.6%(n = 93),II级证据的论文占5.8%(n = 63)。1974年至2012年间,共有224篇论文(14.9%)发表在PubMed数据库收录的期刊上。其中52篇(23.2%)发表在SCI期刊;136篇(60.7%)发表在SCI-E期刊,36篇(16%)发表在PubMed收录的其他期刊。

结论

发表论文的数量和质量有待提高,应采取有效措施提升论文质量。本研究的主要局限在于来自不允许开放获取的大学和培训医院的论文,以及国家论文中心数据库记录不完整。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5766/6197167/a8133b13fff7/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验