Suppr超能文献

血管内超声引导可改善第一代和第二代药物洗脱支架植入过程中的临床结局:一项荟萃分析。

Intravascular ultrasound guidance improves clinical outcomes during implantation of both first- and second-generation drug-eluting stents: a meta-analysis.

作者信息

Nerlekar Nitesh, Cheshire Caitlin J, Verma Kunal P, Ihdayhid Abdul-Rahman, McCormick Liam M, Cameron James D, Bennett Martin R, Malaiapan Yuvaraj, Meredith Ian T, Brown Adam J

机构信息

Monash Cardiovascular Research Centre, Monash University and MonashHeart, Monash Health, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

EuroIntervention. 2017 Jan 20;12(13):1632-1642. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-16-00769.

Abstract

AIMS

Our aim was to assess whether intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) improves clinical outcomes during implantation of first- and second-generation drug-eluting stents (DES). IVUS guidance is associated with improved clinical outcomes during DES implantation, but it is unknown whether this benefit is limited to either first- or second-generation devices.

METHODS AND RESULTS

MEDLINE, EMBASE and PubMed were searched for studies comparing outcomes between IVUS- and angiography-guided PCI. Among 909 potentially relevant studies, 15 trials met the inclusion criteria. The primary endpoint was MACE, defined as death, myocardial infarction, target vessel/lesion revascularisation (TVR/TLR) or stent thrombosis (ST). Summary estimates were obtained using Peto modelling. In total, 9,313 patients from six randomised trials and nine observational studies were included. First-generation DES were implanted in 6,156 patients (3,064 IVUS-guided and 3,092 angiography-guided) and second-generation in 3,157 patients (1,528 IVUS-guided and 1,629 angiography-guided). IVUS guidance was associated with a significant reduction in MACE (odds ratio [OR] 0.73, 95% CI: 0.64-0.85, p<0.001), across both first- (OR 0.79, 95% CI: 0.67-0.92, p=0.01) and second-generation DES (0.57, 95% CI: 0.43-0.77, p<0.001). For second-generation DES, IVUS guidance was associated with significantly lower rates of cardiac death (OR 0.33, 95% CI: 0.14-0.78, p=0.02), TVR (OR 0.47, 95% CI: 0.28-0.79, p=0.006), TLR (OR 0.61, 95% CI: 0.42-0.90, p=0.01) and ST (OR 0.31, 95% CI: 0.12-0.78, p=0.02). Cumulative meta-analysis highlighted progressive temporal benefit towards IVUS-guided PCI to reduce MACE (OR 0.60, 95% CI: 0.48-0.75, p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

IVUS guidance is associated with a significant reduction in MACE during implantation of both first- and second-generation DES platforms. These data support the use of IVUS guidance in contemporary revascularisation procedures using second-generation DES.

摘要

目的

我们的目的是评估血管内超声(IVUS)是否能改善第一代和第二代药物洗脱支架(DES)植入过程中的临床结局。IVUS引导与DES植入过程中改善临床结局相关,但尚不清楚这种益处是否仅限于第一代或第二代器械。

方法和结果

检索MEDLINE、EMBASE和PubMed以查找比较IVUS引导和血管造影引导的PCI结局的研究。在909项潜在相关研究中,15项试验符合纳入标准。主要终点是主要不良心血管事件(MACE),定义为死亡、心肌梗死、靶血管/病变血运重建(TVR/TLR)或支架血栓形成(ST)。使用Peto模型获得汇总估计值。总共纳入了来自6项随机试验和9项观察性研究的9313例患者。6156例患者植入了第一代DES(3064例IVUS引导和3092例血管造影引导),3157例患者植入了第二代DES(1528例IVUS引导和1629例血管造影引导)。IVUS引导与MACE显著降低相关(比值比[OR]0.73,95%置信区间:0.64 - 0.85,p<0.001),在第一代(OR 0.79,95%置信区间:0.67 - 0.92,p = 0.01)和第二代DES(0.57,95%置信区间:0.43 - 0.77,p<0.001)中均如此。对于第二代DES,IVUS引导与心脏死亡(OR 0.33,95%置信区间:0.14 - 0.78,p = 0.02)、TVR(OR 0.47,95%置信区间:0.28 - 0.79,p = 0.006)、TLR(OR 0.61,95%置信区间:0.42 - 0.90,p = 0.01)和ST(OR 0.31,95%置信区间:0.12 - 0.78,p = 0.02)的发生率显著降低相关。累积荟萃分析强调了IVUS引导的PCI在降低MACE方面的时间效益逐渐增加(OR 0.60,95%置信区间:0.48 - 0.75,p<0.001)。

结论

IVUS引导与第一代和第二代DES平台植入过程中MACE的显著降低相关。这些数据支持在使用第二代DES的当代血运重建手术中使用IVUS引导。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验